PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Biomedical Signal Processing and Control0 citationsOpen Access

Estimation of respiratory system parameters using an extended equation of motion during mandatory mechanical ventilation

View Full Paper
ADAnouk van DiepenTBT.H.G.F. BakkesABA.J.R. de Bie

Key Points

  • The extended equation of motion (EEOM) integrates both nonlinear resistance and viscoelasticity for better accuracy.
  • In simulations, EEOM achieved a percentage error of 0.06-1.18% for compliance, outperforming traditional methods.
  • Clinical data analysis of 10 patients showed similar viscoelastic estimates to the interrupter technique, indicating high reliability.
  • Overall, EEOM methodology allows noninvasive identification of key respiratory mechanics using standard ventilator signals.

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is crucial for critically-ill patients, but requires continuous adjustments to prevent injuries and ensure optimal performance. Accurate estimation of respiratory parameters is essential for guiding disease-specific ventilator adjustments and optimizing respiratory support. The traditional equation of motion (EOM), widely used for this purpose, assumes linear compliance and resistance and neglects key physiological phenomena such as flow-dependent resistance and viscoelasticity, which can lead to biased estimates. In this study, we propose and validate an extended equation of motion (EEOM) that integrates nonlinear resistance and viscoelastic effects into a single framework. We fit the EEOM to simulated data, experimental data with a test lung, and clinical patient data (N=10). The accuracy of the EEOM to measure airway resistance, compliance, and viscoelasticity was improved compared to the traditional models (EOM and turbulent EOM, TEOM). In simulations, EEOM method consistently reduced estimation errors across all scenarios. For example, in estimating compliance ( C rs ), EEOM achieved an average percentage error range of 0.06-1.18% across all scenarios, compared to 2.5–14.5% with EOM and 10.5–18.6% with TEOM. Across all parameters and simulations, EEOM yielded lower total mean absolute errors (3.5%) than EOM (11.5%) and TEOM (11.9%). In clinical data, EEOM estimates for viscoelastic parameters ( C d , R d ) were statistically comparable to the interrupter technique ( p > 0 . 05 ), additionally providing real-time estimates for nonlinear resistance terms. These results demonstrate that extended mechanical parameters, including nonlinear resistance and viscoelasticity, can be identified noninvasively using standard ventilator signals, enabling more personalized, safer and adaptive ventilator settings. • An extended equation of motion integrates nonlinear resistance and viscoelasticity. • Extended modeling reduces errors in compliance and resistance estimation across datasets. • Respiratory mechanics are estimated noninvasively using standard ventilator signals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diepen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7670fbadf0bb9e87df772https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2026.109770
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital computer calculation of human pulmonary mechanics using a least squares fit technique1974 · 118 citations
  2. 2Hysteresis As an Indicator of Recruitment and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury Risk*2020 · 26 citations
  3. 3Respiratory Mechanics in Mechanically Ventilated Patients2014 · 258 citations
  4. 4Sequential Quadratic Programming1995 · 1,859 citations
  5. 5Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury2013 · 2,280 citations