PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026Journal of transport economics and policy0 citations

The Benefits of Procurement Auctions: Competitive Pressure vs Selection of Efficient Suppliers

View Full Paper
RLRafael LaliveASArmin SchmutzlerCZChristine Zulehner

Key Points

  • Procurement auctions increase service frequency by 12–16 percent, benefiting train services overall.
  • By adopting auctions, the procurement price decreases by 20–25 percent, enhancing cost-effectiveness.
  • The structural auction framework demonstrates a price reduction of 15–16 percent while selecting efficient suppliers.
  • Using procurement auctions highlights the importance of competitive pressure in reducing markups and overall costs.

Abstract

We study the effects of the procurement mode on the quantity of regional train services and the procurement price in Germany. We exploit a 1996 railway reform. A reduced-form analysis shows that using procurement auctions, rather than directly awarding the contracts to the incumbent, increased the service frequency by 12???16 per cent and decreased the procurement price of a train kilometre by 20???25 per cent. Adopting a structural auction framework, we confirm that auctions reduce prices (though only by 15???16 per cent). We also find that auctions substantially reduce markups, and select more efficient suppliers, thereby reducing costs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalive et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a768bbbadf0bb9e87e5c47https://doi.org/10.3828/jtep.2024.58.1.37
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper