PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Cannabis Research0 citationsOpen Access

Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado’s largest health system: a retrospective cohort study

BGBrock J. GilsdorfLHLaura HelmkampRPRobert L. Page

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in response to the legalization of recreational cannabis in Colorado.
  • Analyzed University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data.
  • Assessed testing rates and positivity rates over time.
  • Utilized Chi-squared tests and t-tests for group comparisons.
  • Employed multivariable log binomial models to analyze demographic predictors of testing.
  • Cannabis positivity rates in UDS increased from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015 but plateaued thereafter.
  • The proportion of visits with cannabis testing decreased from 0.25% to 0.04%.
  • Younger patients, males, and certain racial and ethnic groups were more frequently tested, indicating demographic disparities.

Abstract

Colorado was the first state in the United States to legalize recreational cannabis, which provides a unique opportunity to evaluate cannabis urine drug screen (UDS) testing trends in a large healthcare system in response to that policy. This study examined how testing rates and positivity evolved over time and whether testing patterns varied by demographic factors. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data. We assessed group comparisons with Chi-squared tests and t-tests and demographic predictors of UDS testing using multivariable log binomial models. From 2008 to 2022, the positivity rate for cannabis among UDSs rose from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015, then plateaued. The proportion of visits with cannabis testing declined from 0.25% to 0.04%. Younger patients, males, and individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian were more likely to be tested than their counterparts, with notable racial and ethnic disparities. Despite rising cannabis positivity rates, testing frequency declined. Persistent demographic disparities in testing raise concerns about potential bias, especially in the absence of documented differences in use across groups. Future work should examine indications for cannabis urine drug screen testing and how results influence clinical care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gilsdorf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91cbed6127c7a504bfa8ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00418-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper