PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Movement smoothness matters: The missing piece in the functional assessment of rotator cuff patients. Insights from a stereophotogrammetry experimental study.

LMLetizia ManciniLSLorenzo De SanctisESEmiliano Schena

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate movement smoothness metrics' ability to distinguish between healthy and pathological limbs in rotator cuff tear patients.
  • Thirty-three patients with unilateral rotator cuff tears (RCT) were studied.
  • Patients performed bilateral synchronous arm elevation tasks in three planes: sagittal, scapular, and frontal.
  • Movement smoothness was quantified using various metrics with a 3D optoelectronic motion capture system.
  • Inter-subject variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation.
  • Pathological limbs exhibited consistently lower movement smoothness than healthy limbs across all tested planes.
  • SPARC, SPAL, DSJ, and LDSJ metrics significantly differentiated between the two limbs.
  • SPARC emerged as the most robust metric for assessing movement smoothness in this context.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether movement smoothness metrics can effectively distinguish between pathological and healthy upper limbs in patients with rotator cuff tears (RCT), and aimed to identify the most reliable metrics across time and frequency domains. It also investigated the task dependence of movement smoothness across different planes of arm elevation. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with unilateral RCT performed bilateral synchronous arm elevation tasks in sagittal, scapular, and frontal planes. Movement smoothness was quantified using metrics such as log dimensionless squared jerk (LDSJ), mean arrest period ratio (MAPR) and spectral arc length (SPARC, SPAL), obtained using a 3D Optoelectronic motion capture system. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was used to assess the inter-subject variability. Differences between limbs were tested with the Mann-Whitney RESULTS: Pathological limbs consistently showed lower smoothness than healthy ones across all planes, with SPAL, SPARC, DSJ and LDSJ significantly differentiating the two sides ( CONCLUSION: Smoothness metrics can effectively differentiate pathological from healthy limb movements in patients with RCT, with variability across movement planes. Among the tested metrics, SPARC emerged as the most robust and consistent measure, supporting its use as a biomechanical biomarker for functional assessment and clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mancini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0b85af8044f7a4e968ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70580
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper