PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026Journal of Agriculture and Food Research0 citationsOpen Access

Explainable Deep Learning for Grading of Edible Bird’s Nest (EBN)

View Full Paper
PPPoomsak PojanalaiPAPensiri AkkajitASArsanchai Sukkuea

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a deep learning framework for accurate grading of Edible Bird’s Nest (EBN) utilizing computer vision techniques.
  • Utilized a dataset of 4,326 images, including original and augmented images.
  • Trained and evaluated five CNN models: EfficientNetV2-B0, EfficientNet-B7, ResNet-50, Inception-v3, and MobileNetV3.
  • Employed Grad-CAM for improving interpretability of model predictions.
  • Models achieved classification accuracies ranging from 96% to 99%.
  • All models attained a testing accuracy of 99% on the unseen dataset.
  • MobileNetV3 recorded 99% overall accuracy but showed slight decline for specific grades.

Abstract

Edible Bird’s Nest (EBN), an agricultural product derived from the solidified saliva of swiftlets, presents a classification challenge due to the subtle differences between nest grades. Accurate grading is essential for ensuring product fair pricing and supporting farm-scale production efficiency. This study utilized deep learning–based computer vision techniques to improve the accuracy and consistency of EBN grading across eight categories: A-High, A-Wash, A-White, AB, B, B3, Tiao-A, and Tiao-B, advancing the theoretical application of computer vision in precision agriculture. A total of 4,326 images were used for model training and evaluation, comprising 1,442 original images and 2,884 augmented images. This dataset was utilized to train and evaluate five Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models: EfficientNetV2-B0, EfficientNet-B7, ResNet-50, Inception-v3, and MobileNetV3. During training, the models achieved classification accuracies of 96% to 99%. When evaluated against the unseen testing dataset, all models attained a testing accuracy of 99%. MobileNetV3 achieved an overall accuracy of 99% across most grades; however, it recorded a slight decline for the A-Wash and A-White grades. To improve interpretability, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was employed, confirming that the models focused on essential nest features such as shape and impurity level, rather than background noise. Consequently, this study validates the robustness of the proposed deep learning framework, demonstrating that explainable AI can provide a scientifically rigorous and standardized methodology for EBN quality assessment. • Deep learning architectures analyzed for EBN quality grading. • Dataset expanded to 4,326 images via robust augmentation. • CNN models achieved 96–99% accuracy with high generalization. • Grad-CAM validates feature fidelity and morphological focus. • Establishes a robust framework for objective quality assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pojanalai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0de5af8044f7a4e9783https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102815
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Classification of Edible-nest Swiftlets Using Deep Learning2022 · 8 citations
  2. 2On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning2018 · 1,051 citations
  3. 3On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classification2017 · 603 citations
  4. 4Mobile Computer Vision-Based Applications for Food Recognition and Volume and Calorific Estimation: A Systematic Review2022 · 56 citations
  5. 5A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in food industry2020 · 508 citations