PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Frontiers in Education0 citationsOpen Access

College students’ perceptions of remote online exams: a scoping review

JZJingzhi ZhuangZJZhehan JiangYTYu Tian

Key Points

  • The central aim is to review college students' perceptions of remote online exams to provide insights for enhancements.
  • Conducted a scoping review of existing literature on remote online exams
  • Analyzed studies focusing on students' feedback and experiences with exams
  • Identified common themes in perceptions, advantages, and disadvantages of ROEs
  • Students generally hold positive impressions of remote online exams, citing ease of use as a major advantage.
  • Technology-related problems are frequently mentioned as significant disadvantages.
  • Differing perceptions exist regarding test anxiety and ease of cheating.
  • Several studies suggest various improvements in exam support and structure.

Abstract

Remote online exams (ROEs) have become more prevalent in higher education, however they have long raised issues in the field of online learning, with educators expressing concerns about assessment effectiveness and risks of academic integrity. The article primarily aims to review students’ perceptions of ROEs to offer insights for their future improvement. ROEs most commonly utilize multiple-choice and short-answer questions, and many employ invigilation. Among studies that included relevant explicit information, students predominantly had positive overall impressions of ROEs. Ease of use stood out as the most prominent form of advantage, and technology-related problems were the most frequently mentioned form of disadvantage. On some aspects, such as test anxiety and ease of cheating, different studies reported opposing perceptions. Many studies also proposed solutions concerning aspects such as exam support and exam format. The authors believe that educators should be aware of students’ differences in individual characteristics, such as working style and test anxiety, and try to accommodate the variety of preferences when designing exams if possible. Moreover, the need for improvement exists not only in the exams themselves but also in various aspects surrounding the exams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhuang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada873bc08abd80d5bb697https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1721211
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper