PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Journal of Neuroscience0 citations

Increased and coupled ERP and fMRI responses towards positive social evaluative feedback: An EEG-fMRI study

View Full Paper
APAntje PetersKWKim Altman WeissHHHanne Helming

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate how neural mechanisms process social evaluative feedback relative to an individual's self-view.
  • Participants received feedback categorized as better, congruent, or worse than their self-rating.
  • Event-related potentials (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were utilized concurrently.
  • Brain responses were analyzed focusing on specific regions activated by incongruence in feedback.
  • Increased activation in bilateral superior frontal regions for both types of incongruence compared to congruent feedback.
  • Heavier hemodynamic responses in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum with better feedback versus worse.
  • Larger amplitudes of the LPP component were observed for incongruent feedback, correlating with fMRI findings in striatal and parietal areas.

Abstract

Social evaluative feedback is a key component of human social interaction, influencing self-view, behavior, and psychological well-being. This study investigates the neural mechanisms underlying social feedback processing in relation to self-view congruence. Participants (N = 54: 38 female, 15 male, 1 non-binary) received putative evaluative feedback that was better, congruent, or worse than their self-view rating, previously presented. Brain responses were investigated using combined measurement of Event-related Potentials (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Both types of incongruence, better and worse, compared to congruent evaluative feedback, elicited increased activations in bilateral superior frontal regions. Comparing incongruent better to worse feedback revealed increased hemodynamic responses in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the ventral striatum, and the Precuneus (Pc). The Late Positive Potential (LPP) component of the EEG showed larger amplitudes to incongruent than to congruent feedback and, similarly to the fMRI effect, larger amplitudes for better than worse feedback. Correlation of ERP and fMRI findings revealed significant relationships between the LPP and the striatum, as well as between the LPP and Pc, for better-worse differences. Thus, our findings suggest specific frontal activations associated with the evaluation of feedback incongruence, as well as additional frontal, posterior, and striatal valence-dependent activations representing reward-related processing and positively biased feedback integration. We propose that, after a first sweep of self-incongruence detection, selective neural responses to better feedback are driven by an evaluation of the subjective positivity of the feedback, opening the possibility of further elaboration on process feedback information integrated into the self.Significance statement We examined ERP and fMRI responses to investigate the neural processing of social evaluative feedback that aligns with or contradicts one's self-view. By combining temporal and spatial resolution, we reveal that incongruent positive feedback elicits distinct neural responses involving reward-related and self-view integration mediating brain regions, with the largest ERP amplitudes during the Late Positive Potential. EEG-fMRI integration reveals valence-dependent relationships between ERP and fMRI responses in striatal and parietal regions, thereby advancing our understanding of the spatio-temporal brain activation patterns of valence-dependent social evaluative feedback processing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peters et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada885bc08abd80d5bb98chttps://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1181-25.2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper