PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026The Journal of Headache and Pain0 citationsOpen Access

Unveiling state-specific neural dynamics in migraine with and without depressive symptom: a hidden Markov model and interpretable machine learning approach

ZZZhiyang ZhangCXChaorong XieLDLinglin Dong

Key Points

  • This research investigates how brain dynamics differ between migraine with and without depressive symptoms using advanced imaging and machine learning techniques.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional analysis involving 204 migraine patients and 90 healthy controls.
  • Applied resting-state functional MRI data to assess brain dynamics using Hidden Markov Model.
  • Utilized several machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest) for classification and interpretability analysis using SHAP.
  • Identified six dynamic brain states through the Hidden Markov Model analysis.
  • The dMIG group displayed increased transitions and activity in key brain regions compared to the ndMIG group.
  • Achieved a high classification performance with the XGBoost model (test set AUC = 0.86, accuracy = 75.81%).

Abstract

Migraine with depressive symptom (dMIG) constitutes a more severe clinical condition than migraine without depressive symptom (ndMIG), and is likely underpinned by distinct neuropathophysiology. While traditional neuroimaging has linked these clinical differences to static functional connectivity (FC) alterations, the role of dynamic brain network interactions which may more directly reflect the fluctuating nature of symptoms remains poorly understood. In this cross-sectional study, we examined the spatiotemporal brain dynamics from resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data of 204 migraine patients (100 dMIG and 104 ndMIG), and 90 healthy controls (HCs) using Hidden Markov Model (HMM). By integrating multiple machine learning algorithms: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Random Forest, with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)-based interpretability analysis, we aimed to identify and elucidate potential dynamic neuroimaging biomarkers capable of distinguishing these two subtypes. Six HMM states were identified in this study. Significant differences in brain network dynamics were observed among the groups. The dMIG group showed higher transition probabilities between states 4, 5, 6 and enhanced activity in sensorimotor, dorsolateral prefrontal, and temporal regions. Conversely, the ndMIG group exhibited prolonged dwell time in state 3, a reduced global transition rate, and heightened sensorimotor activity. The XGBoost model achieved superior classification performance (test set AUC = 0.86, accuracy = 75.81%). SHAP analysis identified the fractional occupancy of states 3, 5 and 2 as the top three discriminative features. Migraine with depressive symptom is characterized by brain state instability and co-activation of pain and mood network, while migraine without depressive symptom exhibits functional inflexibility, persistently engaging pain-related regions. These distinct spatiotemporal patterns offer biomarkers with the potential to inform subtype-specific diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8cfbc08abd80d5bc32ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02320-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Neuroimaging-based subtyping of migraine identifies clinically distinct phenotypes2026
  2. 2Altered static-dynamic interhemispheric connectivity and transcriptional features underlying lateralization in patients with migraine2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Divergent functional connectivity patterns in menstrually-related and non-menstrual migraine: A large-scale resting-state fMRI study2025
  4. 4Temporal neural dynamics patterns in episodic and chronic migraine: a magnetoencephalography study2026
  5. 5Dual-attention temporal graph neural network on resting-state fMRI dynamic functional connectivity identifies risk-related patterns of migraine chronification2026