PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Communist and Post-Communist Studies0 citations

We Are All Netnographers Now? Fieldwork in an Age of Participatory Warfare

View Full Paper
JNJethro Norman

Key Points

  • This article examines the challenges of ethnographic fieldwork in conflict zones, focusing on digital technology's impact.
  • Examined fieldwork experiences in conflict zones like Somalia, Ukraine, and South Sudan.
  • Assessed the ethical implications of using smartphones as both research tools and weapons.
  • Reflected on the intersection of online and offline experiences during fieldwork.
  • Digital technology reshapes how researchers conduct fieldwork in conflicts.
  • Researchers may unintentionally become participants in warfare due to their digital engagements.
  • Awareness of security risks linked to technology is critically limited.

Abstract

This article explores the ethical and practical challenges of conducting long-term ethnographic fieldwork in conflict zones in an era of widespread smartphone and social media use. It argues that digital technology not only transforms methodological approaches but also reshapes the nature of war itself. Drawing on insights from fieldwork in various conflict zones, including Somalia, Ukraine, and South Sudan, it asks: How does rapidly acquired digital connectivity change the way we conceptualize, approach, and conduct fieldwork in conflict zones? When smartphones are both research tools and potential weapons of war (Ford and Hoskins 2022), how can we use them ethically? Reflecting on three online/offline complexities of the author’s fieldwork experiences in Somalia/Somaliland in 2021, the article suggests that participative warfare and digital research methodologies are intertwined, driven by the proliferation of connected devices. Practical, ethical, and security concerns arise from this intersection. First, researchers may become direct participants in war, whether physically present or not. Second, there is limited awareness of the security risks posed by technology, especially given the rise of mis- and disinformation in conflict settings. Finally, since the traditional notion of the “field” has collapsed, making us potentially reachable anywhere and at any time, we need to reconsider how we establish temporal boundaries to ensure safe and sustainable research practices. The article concludes that researchers must navigate a blended field of offline and online phenomena, underscoring the need to safeguard in-person fieldwork while allowing sufficient time to engage with the digital realm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jethro Norman (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8dfbc08abd80d5bc428https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2026.2444473
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper