PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Visible Light Excitation on Electrical Potential Kinetics of Thermally Grown a-SiO2 Surfaces at Micro/Nano Scale

View Full Paper
YDYuri DekhtyarHMHiran C. G. MaladenigeHSHermanis Sorokins

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how low-power visible light affects the surface potential of thermally grown a-SiO2.
  • Used amplitude-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy (AM-KPFM) to measure surface potential changes.
  • Performed experiments with continuous-wave diode lasers at 405, 505, and 685 nm.
  • Recorded contact potential difference (CPD) on ~0.6 µm p-type a-SiO2 during light exposure and relaxation phases.
  • 405 nm and 505 nm lasers caused negative CPD shifts of ~-28 mV and ~-16 mV, respectively.
  • The CPD response to 405 nm light followed bi-exponential kinetics, indicating fast and slow processes.
  • Post illumination, the CPD relaxed to ~-23 mV over ~103 s, highlighting a significant retention period.

Abstract

Thermally grown amorphous SiO2 (a-SiO2) on Si is widely used in microfluidic and biointerface devices, where surface charge governs capillary flows. We used amplitude-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy (AM-KPFM) in air to test whether low-power visible light modulates a-SiO2 surface potential and to derive mathematical charging-discharging models. Single-point contact potential difference (CPD) was recorded on ~0.6 µm p-type a-SiO2 on p-type monocrystalline Si during repeated illumination cycles with continuous-wave diode lasers at 405, 505, and 685 nm delivered by optical fiber. The 405 and 505 nm wavelengths produced reproducible negative CPD shifts with steady-state values of ~−28 mV and ~−16 mV, while 685 nm stayed within noise (±2.5 mV). The 405 nm response followed bi-exponential kinetics with fast (tens of seconds) and slow (hundreds of seconds) components dominated by the slow process; after switch-off, CPD relaxed only from ~−28 to ~−23 mV over ~103 s, indicating retention for ≥103–104 s. The 505 nm charging trace fit a single slower xponential, whereas discharging could not be fit robustly. These results demonstrate wavelength-dependent optical tuning of a-SiO2 surface potential and provide compact kinetic descriptors for comparing charging, discharging, and retention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dekhtyar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8dfbc08abd80d5bc4b0https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18030460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of nitrogen atmosphere and vacuum conditions on charge dynamics in mesoscale porous silicon2026
  2. 2Femtosecond laser modification of amorphous silicon films for photovoltaic and polarization optics applications2025
  3. 3Quantitative Analysis of the Semiconductor–Electrolyte Interface Using Cyclic Voltammetry Measurements2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Band Alignment and Surface Photo‐Voltage Analysis of C‐Si/Siox/Poly‐Silicon Passivating‐Contact Stacks Through X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Tracking Surface Charge Dynamics on Single Nanoparticles2024 · 1 citations