PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Environmental Science and Pollution Research0 citationsOpen Access

Partial replacement of cement with port dredging waste in the production of coating mortars

IBISABELA DEVESA BATISTAJNJuliana Fadini NatalliMMMarkssuel Teixeira Marvila

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the potential of port dredging waste as a sustainable partial replacement for cement in coating mortars.
  • Tested two types of cement: Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement (CSA).
  • Replaced cement with port dredging waste at 10%, 30%, and 50% by mass.
  • Conducted evaluations of fresh and hardened properties, including compressive strength and water retention.
  • Replacing 10% of OPC with dredging waste increased compressive strength from 4.06 to 4.59 MPa.
  • Tensile strength improved from 0.3461 to 0.5796 MPa with 10% replacement of OPC.
  • Higher percentages of dredging waste in CSA mixtures led to reduced mechanical performance.

Abstract

Abstract The accelerated expansion of the cement industry, driven by the growing housing demand in urban centers, has resulted in increased consumption of raw materials and elevated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Simultaneously, the disposal of dredged material from ports and navigation channels presents an environmental concern, as improper management can significantly harm marine ecosystems. This study investigates the use of port dredging waste (PDW) as a supplementary cementitious material in coating mortars acting as a filler material, promoting packing and nucleation. Two types of cement were used: Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) and Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement (CSA), with PDW partially replacing cement at 10%, 30%, and 50% in mass, along with a control mix without replacement. The experimental program included evaluations of fresh and hardened properties, such as consistency (flow table and plunger tests), bulk density, entrained air content, water retention, flow, hydration kinetics by isothermal calorimetry, capillary water absorption, compressive and tensile strength, adhesion to substrates, and durability under wet-dry cycles. Characterization of the PDW indicated that it is appropriate for use as a filler material in coating mortars. In the fresh state, the incorporation of PDW reduced workability due to increased water demand, as observed in consistency tests. In the hardened state, replacing 10% of OPC with PDW improved compressive strength from 4.06 to 4.59 MPa and tensile strength from 0.3461 to 0.5796 MPa. In contrast, CSA-based mixtures showed reduced mechanical performance and durability as PDW content increased. These results suggest that 10% PDW replacement in OPC-based mortars is a viable and sustainable alternative, while further research is needed to address technical challenges in CSA-based systems. Practically, the use of PDW in OPC mortars offers an environmentally friendly strategy to reduce cement consumption, valorize dredged materials, and enhance the sustainability of construction coatings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

BATISTA et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada90bbc08abd80d5bc60fhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-37561-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper