PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Methodological Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems in Rwanda Using Difference-in-Differences for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

View Full Paper
KMKyobwa MukaszaKAKwegyiragaba Akinyi

Key Points

  • The evaluation aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of public health surveillance systems in Rwanda using a systematic review methodology.
  • Conducted a systematic review to identify relevant studies
  • Screened studies based on predefined criteria
  • Assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
  • Utilized a difference-in-differences model for analysis
  • Mixed results were found regarding the effectiveness of surveillance systems
  • Some systems showed cost savings compared to baseline conditions
  • Potential for the difference-in-differences model to measure cost-effectiveness
  • Need for further empirical studies to validate findings

Abstract

Public health surveillance systems are essential for monitoring diseases and managing resources efficiently in Rwanda. A systematic review methodology was employed to identify relevant studies. Studies were screened based on predefined criteria and assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The analysis revealed mixed results regarding the effectiveness of surveillance systems, with some showing cost savings compared to baseline conditions. While the difference-in-differences model demonstrated potential in measuring cost-effectiveness, further empirical studies are needed to validate these findings and identify key factors influencing system performance. Investigate specific system components that contribute to cost savings or inefficiencies and consider implementing robust monitoring practices for continuous improvement. Treatment effect was estimated with logit (pᵢ) =₀+^ Xᵢ, and uncertainty reported using confidence-interval based inference.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukasza et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada962bc08abd80d5bcae5https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18902477
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper