PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Field-Level Uncertainty Quantification for AI-Based Ship Hull Surface Pressure Prediction

View Full Paper
JSJin H. SeoILInwon Lee

Key Points

  • The research aims to quantify uncertainty in ship hull surface pressure predictions using a U-Net model and deep ensemble approaches.
  • Utilized a speed-conditioned U-Net trained on a comprehensive CFD dataset for ship hull pressure predictions.
  • Estimated mean pressure and log-variance at grid locations using a negative log-likelihood loss function.
  • Quantified aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty through a deep ensemble of independently trained models.
  • Evaluated model reliability and calibration of confidence intervals at the field level.
  • Calibration improves with an increase in ensemble size, surpassing nominal confidence levels.
  • Aleatoric uncertainty is dominant and shows low sensitivity to ensemble size.
  • Epistemic uncertainty mainly influences calibration, especially in challenging prediction areas.
  • Higher uncertainty is observed near free-surface regions at the bow and stern, indicating prediction challenges.

Abstract

This study investigates uncertainty quantification for field-level ship hull surface pressure predictions using a U-Net-based data-driven model. A speed-conditioned U-Net is trained on a large CFD dataset covering multiple ship types and velocity conditions to predict pressure distributions on hull surfaces. The model outputs the mean pressure and log-variance at each grid location using a negative log-likelihood loss, allowing aleatoric uncertainty to be estimated, while epistemic uncertainty is quantified by a deep ensemble of independently trained models. The reliability and calibration of the predicted confidence intervals are evaluated at the field level. The results show that calibration stabilizes as ensemble size increases, and coverage slightly exceeds nominal confidence levels. Uncertainty decomposition indicates that aleatoric uncertainty dominates and is insensitive to ensemble size, while epistemic uncertainty primarily affects calibration. Elevated uncertainty is consistently observed near free-surface regions around the bow and stern, reflecting increased prediction difficulty. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of deep-ensemble-based uncertainty quantification for CFD-driven pressure field prediction models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada962bc08abd80d5bcb0dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper