PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Integrative Organismal Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Unsupervised wing-bone morphogroups in bats reveal phylogenetic and functional patterns

View Full Paper
SZS S ZalapaJAJ M Vargas AldacoSGSergio Guerrero-Vázquez

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how variation in bat wing bone proportions influences wing morphology and evolutionary patterns.
  • Measured ten wing bone elements' proportions relative to forearm length in 526 bats across 59 species.
  • Applied principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering for unsupervised grouping.
  • Performed linear discriminant analysis for validating morpho-wing bone groups.
  • Identified five distinct morpho-wing bone groups that capture coordinated variation in wing elements.
  • Demonstrated higher discriminant accuracy compared to established ecological classifications.
  • Showed that some morpho-wing bone groups exhibit strong phylogenetic conservatism while others illustrate functional convergence.

Abstract

Abstract Bat wings are complex biomechanical systems whose skeletal components play a central role in shaping flight performance. Although wing morphology in bats has traditionally been characterized using aerodynamic indices and ecological guilds, the contribution of individual wing bones to emergent patterns of wing design remains poorly understood. Here, we test whether interspecific variation in wing bone proportions is sufficient to generate objective, unsupervised morpho–wing bone groups across Chiroptera. We quantified proportional variation in ten wing bone elements relative to forearm length in 526 individuals representing 59 species from six bat families. Log-ratio–transformed measurements were analyzed using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering, followed by linear discriminant analysis for group validation. We identified five robust morpho–wing bone groups (MWBGs) that explain coordinated variation in distal, intermediate, and proximal wing elements. These groups were recovered independently of a priori ecological classifications and showed higher discriminant performance than established foraging guilds. Phylogenetic mapping revealed that some MWBGs reflect strong phylogenetic conservatism (e.g., Molossidae), whereas others arise repeatedly across unrelated lineages, suggesting functional convergence in wing skeletal design. Distal phalanges and metacarpals emerged as key contributors to multivariate differentiation. Our results demonstrate that proportional variation in individual wing bones captures fundamental structural dimensions of bat wing morphology and provides a complementary, skeleton-centered framework for investigating the evolution of flight diversity in bats.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zalapa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25be596eeacc4fceca454https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obag007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Wing Morphology of Japanese Bats: Predicting Ecological Features for Data-insufficient Species.2024
  2. 2Beyond head and wings: Unveiling influence of diet, body size, and phylogeny on the evolution of the femur in phyllostomid bats2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3A hairy situation: The diversity of bat wing pelage and its functional implications2025
  4. 4Morphological Stasis in Wing Traits Despite Species Diversification in African and Malagasy <scp> <i>Miniopterus</i> </scp> Bats2026
  5. 5Testing the “Big Mother” Hypothesis in New World Bats: Do Wing Structures Show Evidence of Sexual Dimorphism?2026