PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism0 citations

Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate and Risk of Vascular Events and Death in Type 2 Diabetes in the ADVANCE Study

View Full Paper
RWRuirui WangYZYonghong ZhangYGYijie Gao

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how insulin resistance, measured by eGDR, impacts the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
  • Analyzed data from 11,140 participants with type 2 diabetes from the ADVANCE trial.
  • Calculated eGDR based on waist circumference, hypertension status, and glycated hemoglobin in 11,081 participants.
  • Employed multivariable Cox models to estimate hazard ratios for clinical events associated with eGDR.
  • 19.1% (2117 participants) experienced a major macrovascular or microvascular event over 5 years.
  • Highest eGDR participants had significantly lower risks of major events compared to the lowest quarter (HR 0.72).
  • Significant reductions observed for major macrovascular events (HR 0.68), major microvascular events (HR 0.78), all-cause mortality (HR 0.69), and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.62).
  • No major effect modification detected for intensive glucose and BP-lowering treatments based on eGDR status.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims To determine the association of insulin resistance, assessed using the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), and the risk of adverse clinical outcomes, and determine any effect modification on the efficacy of glucose‐ and blood pressure (BP)‐lowering treatments. Materials and Methods Briefly, 11 140 participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were recruited from 20 countries for the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. eGDR was derived from waist circumference, hypertension status and glycated haemoglobin, calculated in 11 081 participants. Multivariable Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of the association of eGDR with clinical events. Results Over a median of 5 years of follow‐up, 2117 participants (19.1%) experienced a major macrovascular or microvascular event. Compared with individuals in the lowest quarter of eGDR, those in the highest quarter had significantly lower risks of a composite major macrovascular and microvascular event (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62–0.84). Similar associations were seen for major macrovascular events (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55–0.85), major microvascular events (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.96), all‐cause mortality (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55–0.86), and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45–0.85). No significant effect modification was observed across eGDR quarters for the efficacy or safety of intensive glucose control (vs. standard control) or BP–lowering treatment (vs. placebo). Conclusion These findings highlight the value of eGDR as a prognostic marker for T2D. Intensive glucose‐ and BP‐lowering treatments remain beneficial regardless of insulin resistance status. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00145925

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25be596eeacc4fceca51ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70608
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper