PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Water Resources Research0 citationsOpen Access

Satellite Solutions: Facing Chlorophyll‐ a Retrieval in Small Mountain Lakes in the Sierra Nevada, Spain

View Full Paper
JLJ. Llodrà‐LlabrésJPJ. C. Pérez‐GirónTPThedmer Postma

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess how different spectral and spatial resolutions affect chlorophyll a concentration estimates in small mountain lakes.
  • Repeated sampling of five lakes in Sierra Nevada over 2020, 2021, and 2023.
  • Analysis of 100 chlorophyll a samples with coincident satellite imagery.
  • Comparison of 86 spectral indices and bands from Sentinel-2, Planet, and WorldView-3 for modeling chlorophyll a concentrations.
  • Models using multiple predictors and green/near-infrared bands performed best.
  • Sentinel-2 and Planet models yielded R adj 2 values above 0.45, outperforming WorldView-3.
  • Planet model showed stable performance with low RMSE near the shoreline, achieving R adj 2 values around 0.3.

Abstract

Abstract National and international regulations enforce monitoring programmes of water quality to guide management actions of inland water ecosystems. Our study evaluates the effect of spectral and spatial resolutions on the estimation of chlorophyll‐ a concentrations in mountain lakes, and derives implications for addressing the adjacency effect, which is critical and understudied in small water bodies. Five lakes in Sierra Nevada (Spain) were repeatedly sampled during 2020, 2021, and 2023, and a total of 100 chlorophyll‐ a samples with suitable coincident satellite imagery were analyzed. Laboratory‐obtained chlorophyll‐ a concentrations were modeled comparing up to 86 spectral indices and bands as predictors from three satellites: Sentinel‐2 (12 bands, 20 m/pixel), Planet (8 bands, 3 m/pixel) and WorldView‐3 (11 bands, 1.24 m/pixel). Our results showed that multivariate models for estimating chlorophyll‐ a using spectral indices did not perform significantly better than using bands alone. The best models always had multiple predictors and included green and near‐infrared bands. Models based on Sentinel‐2 and Planet ( R adj 2 > 0.45) outperformed those of WorldView‐3 ( R adj 2 ∼ 0.37), confirming that the latter performed worst despite higher spatial resolution. Regarding distance to shoreline, the Planet model showed the most consistent performance, with stable R adj 2 values and low RMSE even at 3 m from shore with a high level of accuracy ( R adj 2 ∼ 0.3; RMSE ∼ 1.15 μg L −1 ). Data and models are released to facilitate near‐real‐time monitoring of these vulnerable ecosystems, where field sampling is extremely challenging.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Llodrà‐Llabrés et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25be596eeacc4fceca543https://doi.org/10.1029/2026wr043523
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative Study of In Situ Chlorophyll-a Measuring Methods and Remote Sensing Techniques Focusing on Different Applied Algorithms in an Inland Lake2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll-a in Clear vs. Turbid Waters in Lakes2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll-A in Clear vs. Turbid Waters in Lakes2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Comparative Evaluation of Semi-Empirical Approaches to Retrieve Satellite-Derived Chlorophyll-a Concentrations from Nearshore and Offshore Waters of a Large Lake (Lake Ontario)2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Monitoring of Chlorophyll-a Levels in Lakes2025