PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026ETRI Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Performance comparison of object detection models for video analytics under varying video compression quality conditions

View Full Paper
KMKholidiyah MasykurohHHendrawanEMEueung Mulyana

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate how different video compression qualities impact the performance of various object detection models.
  • Benchmarking five object detection models: Fast R-CNN, EfficientDet, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and DETR.
  • Evaluating model performance under three video quality levels: High, Medium, and Low.
  • Assessing performance using bitrate (Mbps), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR, dB), and detection accuracy.
  • PSNR scales approximately linearly with bitrate.
  • Detection accuracy shows saturation with diminishing returns at higher bitrates.
  • YOLOv5 is the most robust against compression, while EfficientDet and YOLOv8 are more sensitive to degradation.

Abstract

Summary Video analytics (VA) systems are becoming increasingly reliant on deep‐neural‐network‐based object detection, where video compression parameters such as resolution, bitrate, and quantization significantly affect inference accuracy. This paper presents a benchmarking study on five object detection models, namely Fast R‐CNN, EfficientDet, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and DETR, which were evaluated using three encoder‐defined video quality levels (High, Medium, and Low). Performance was assessed using bitrate (Mbps), peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR, dB), and detection accuracy to provide a reproducible framework for analyzing compression‐induced performance variations. Experimental results reveal that PSNR scales approximately linearly with bitrate, whereas detection accuracy exhibits saturation with diminishing returns at higher bitrates. YOLOv5 exhibited the highest robustness to compression, followed by Fast R‐CNN and DETR, whereas EfficientDet and YOLOv8 were more sensitive to quality degradation. We identify practical operating points that balance accuracy and bandwidth efficiency, providing actionable guidance for model–codec co‐design in surveillance and smart‐city VA applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Masykuroh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3abc502a1e69014cccdcchttps://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2025-0363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper