PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2026Entropy2 citationsOpen Access

Agentic Finance: An Adaptive Inference Framework for Bounded-Rational Investing Agents

View Full Paper
SMSamuel Montañez-JacquezJCJohn H. ClippingerMMMatthew Moroney

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a framework for portfolio management that adapts to changing financial environments.
  • Introduces Adaptive Inference framework extending Active Inference to portfolio management.
  • Models investment decisions as dynamics of belief updating and action selection.
  • Evaluates on ARKK Innovation ETF using train-test evaluation and cross-asset validation on S&P 500 ETF.
  • Identifies the Passivity Paradox where frozen belief transfer outperforms naive adaptive learning.
  • Achieves a Sharpe ratio of 0.39 against −0.28 for naive methods, indicating belief contamination.
  • All agents reduce realized volatility compared to ARKK Buy-and-Hold (43.0% annualized).
  • Validates inference-guided risk shaping resulting in a positive excess return.

Abstract

We propose Adaptive Inference, a portfolio management framework extending Active Inference to non-stationary financial environments. The framework integrates inference, control, and execution under endogenous uncertainty, modeling investment decisions as coupled dynamics of belief updating, preference encoding, and action selection rather than optimization over fixed objectives. In this approach, portfolio behavior is governed by the expected free energy (EFE) minimization, showing that classical valuation models emerge as limiting cases when epistemic components vanish. Using train–test evaluation on the ARKK Innovation ETF (2015–2025), we identify a Passivity Paradox: frozen belief transfer outperforms naive adaptive learning. A Professional Agent achieves a Sharpe ratio of 0.39 while its adaptive counterpart degrades to −0.28, reflecting belief contamination when learning from policy-dependent signals. Crucially, the architecture is not designed to generate alpha but to perform endogenous risk management that mitigates overtrading under regime ambiguity and distributional shift. Adaptive Inference Agents maintain long exposure most of the time while tactically reducing positions during high-entropy periods, implementing uncertainty-aware passive investing. All agents reduce realized volatility relative to ARKK Buy-and-Hold (43.0% annualized). Cross-asset validation on the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) shows that inference-guided risk shaping achieves a positive Entropic Sharpe Ratio (ESR), defined as excess return per unit of informational work, thereby quantifying the economic value of information under thermodynamic constraints on inference.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montañez-Jacquez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4b9fb18185d8a398024dbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/e28030321
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AdaptInvest A Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for Personalized Investment Advisory2026
  2. 2Adaptive agent-based modeling in finance: selected applications2025
  3. 3Adaptive LLM-based multi-agent systems to enhance quantitative trading performance2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Agentic Finance: Architecting and Governing Agentic Trading System2026
  5. 5Toward a unified agentic framework for regime-aware portfolio optimization with LLM signals2026