PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Buzz Group Method for Teaching Anatomy to Medical Undergraduates in A Small Group

View Full Paper
I(International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)

Key Points

  • Assess the Buzz Group Method's impact on student academic performance and faculty perceptions in anatomy teaching.
  • Interventional study in the Department of Anatomy with 85 first-year MBBS students.
  • Pre-test/post-test design using structured MCQ on the mandible.
  • Teaching session conducted using the Buzz Group Method followed by a post-test.
  • Faculty feedback collected via structured questionnaire.
  • Data analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-test.
  • Significant improvement in post-test scores compared to pre-test scores, particularly on nerve supply and muscle attachment (p < 0.05).
  • Faculty feedback showed 72% agreement on enhanced student interest, 76% on participation, and 72% on understanding.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Traditional lecture-based methods in anatomy often result in passive learning and limited student engagement. Active learning strategies like the Buzz Group Method may enhance student participation, understanding, and retention of anatomical concepts. Objectives: To assess the impact of the Buzz Group Method on students’ academic performance and to gather faculty perceptions regarding its feasibility and effectiveness in anatomy teaching. Methods: An interventional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, involving 85 first-year MBBS students. A pre-test/post-test design was used. Students were given a structured MCQ-based pre-test on the mandible, followed by a teaching session using the Buzz Group Method. A post-test with the same questions was conducted to measure learning gain. Faculty feedback was also collected using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: A significant improvement was observed in post-test scores compared to pre-test scores for several questions, particularly those related to nerve supply and muscle attachment (p < 0.05). Faculty feedback indicated strong agreement that the method enhanced student interest (72%), participation (76%), and understanding (72%). Conclusion: The Buzz Group Method was found to be an effective small-group teaching strategy for anatomy, promoting active participation and better understanding among students. Faculty feedback also supported its feasibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR) (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b5ff6e83145bc643d1bf5ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18997500
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper