PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2026Reproductive Medicine and Biology0 citationsOpen Access

Endometrial Microbiome and Implantation: From Basic Knowledge to Clinical Medicine

View Full Paper
DHDaiki HiratsukaMMMitsunori MatsuoYHYasushi Hirota

Key Points

  • To explore how the endometrial microbiome impacts implantation and fertility outcomes.
  • Clinically oriented narrative review of existing studies on endometrial microbiome and its association with implantation.
  • Analysis of vaginal dysbiosis and its link to reproductive outcomes.
  • Review of Lactobacillus profiles in relation to ART outcomes.
  • Lactobacillus-enriched profiles correlate with better pregnancy outcomes.
  • Non–Lactobacillus-dominant patterns are linked to higher rates of implantation failure.
  • Testing-guided management using antibiotics and probiotics shows mixed results.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is an infertility condition in which uterine factors remain difficult to diagnose and treat. Recent studies implicate the endometrial microbiome in implantation. Methods This clinically oriented narrative review summarizes female reproductive tract microbiota and evidence on endometrial microbiome testing and management in infertility. Main Findings (Results) Vaginal dysbiosis is linked to adverse reproductive outcomes and provides a reference for interpreting upper‐tract findings. Endometrial microbial signals are detectable by sequencing, but interpretation is challenged by the low‐biomass environment and vulnerability to carry‐over, kitome effects, and contamination. Across ART studies, a Lactobacillus ‐enriched endometrial profile is more often associated with favorable pregnancy‐related outcomes, whereas non– Lactobacillus ‐dominant patterns are more frequently reported in implantation failure, although effect sizes and statistical significance vary across cohorts and depend on sampling validity and cutoff definitions. Limited nonrandomized intervention studies suggest that testing‐guided targeted management (typically antibiotics with or without vaginal Lactobacillus ‐containing probiotics) may benefit selected patients, but protocols are heterogeneous and results remain inconsistent. Conclusion Evidence is rapidly evolving, yet observational designs and methodological variability limit causal inference. Future progress will require standardized sampling and contamination controls, outcome‐anchored threshold validation, and pragmatic real‐world evaluations of protocolized test‐and‐treat pathways using clinically meaningful endpoints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hiratsuka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b6069b83145bc643d1cc0ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.70040
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota (DOGMA) – A novel theory for the development of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome2012 · 357 citations
  2. 2Culturomics: a new approach to study the human microbiome2012 · 132 citations
  3. 3What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases2019 · 3,464 citations
  4. 4Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges2020 · 2,254 citations
  5. 5Genital tract dysbiosis in infertile women with a history of repeated implantation failure and pilot study for reproductive outcomes following oral enteric coating lactoferrin supplementation2022 · 16 citations