PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Organisationsberatung Supervision Coaching0 citationsOpen Access

Nothing Compares 2 U: Exploring human coach distinctiveness in an age of AI

View Full Paper
JPJonathan PassmoreANAndy Nobes

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how coaches perceive their distinctiveness and contributions compared to AI coaching agents.
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with thirteen coaches from multiple countries
  • Utilized Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) for data analysis
  • Developed four themes related to coaching practices and human qualities
  • Coaches emphasized the role of lived experience in establishing rapport
  • Trust was accelerated through credibility and shared language
  • Participants highlighted the need for restraint to avoid overstepping boundaries
  • Curiosity was better preserved when distance from prior domain experience was maintained

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how workplace coaches make sense of their career-work experience in their coaching work with senior leader clients and whether it contributes to qualities perceived as distinctively human when compared with AI coaching agents. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirteen coaches from seven countries across three continents and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) with cross-case integration. Four themes were developed: (1) using experience for sharpening insight and rapport, (2) balancing shared experience with universal leadership realities, (3) strategic sharing through story and metaphor and (4) coaching maturity guiding decisions on when to use lived experience. Participants described credibility and shared language as accelerating trust, while also emphasising restraint, permission and self-regulation to avoid advice giving and assumption. Coaches also reported that distance from a former domain can protect curiosity. Findings inform coach selection and matching and highlight the importance of context-sensitive judgement when integrating experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Passmore et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba422e4e9516ffd37a2310https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-026-00994-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The coach bots are coming: exploring global coaches’ attitudes and responses to the threat of AI coaching2024 · 37 citations
  2. 2“Two sides of the same coin?” Coaching and mentoring and the agentic role of context2020 · 45 citations
  3. 3An integrative model for executive coaching.2007 · 132 citations
  4. 4Behind closed doors: What really happens in executive coaching1999 · 361 citations
  5. 5Theory and Practice: Designing and implementing coaching/mentoring competencies: a case study2003 · 23 citations