PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of ground-motion prediction equations using observations and information theory: application to the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau

YYYoutian YangAIAlik Ismail-ZadehJWJidong Wu

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the applicability of ground-motion prediction equations in a tectonically complex area with limited observational data.
  • Evaluated ground-motion prediction equations using residual-based error metrics and information-theory-based evaluations.
  • Analyzed data from the 2022 Menyuan and 2023 Jishishan earthquakes for model behavior.
  • Extended analysis to historical earthquakes from 1920 and 1927 to assess stability.
  • Information-theory-based evaluation provided consistent rankings and stable weights across different earthquakes.
  • Residual analysis indicated event-specific variability in ground-motion predictions.
  • Combined approaches offered complementary insights into the applicability of GMPEs in data-limited regions.

Abstract

Ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are fundamental to seismic hazard assessment, yet their applicability is difficult to evaluate in tectonically complex regions where instrumental observations are sparse or absent, such as the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. We evaluate representative GMPEs using two approaches: residual-based error metrics and an information- theory-based evaluation. The two recent earthquakes, the 2022 Menyuan and 2023 Jishishan events, provide an opportunity to examine model behavior under observed conditions. The information- theory-based approach is first applied to these two earthquakes to verify feasibility and to compare with residual-based outcomes, and is then extended to two large historical earthquakes in the region, the 1920 Haiyuan earthquake and the 1927 Gulang earthquake, to assess stability under extrapolative, data-limited conditions. Across these applications, the information-theory-based evaluation yields consistent rankings and stable weights, whereas the residual analysis captures event-specific variability. Together, the two approaches provide complementary insight into model applicability and offer a practical basis for ground-motion assessment and extrapolation in tectonically complex and observationally sparse regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba429c4e9516ffd37a305bhttps://doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000191384
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessment of ground-motion prediction equations using observations and information theory: application to the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau2026
  2. 2Dealing with uncertainties related to ground motion prediction models for Georgia, Caucasus Region.2024
  3. 3Development and use of semi-empirical spectral ground motion models for GPP-induced micro-earthquakes in Southern Germany2024
  4. 4Physically adjusted ground motion prediction equations for induced seismicity at Preston New Road, UK2024
  5. 5Development and Use of Semi-empirical Spectral Ground Motion Models for GPP-Induced Micro-earthquakes in Southern Germany2024