PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering2 citationsOpen Access

YOLO Variant Evaluation and Transfer Learning Analysis for Side-Scan Sonar Object Detection

View Full Paper
LLLinlin LiuHLHoupu LiJZJunwei Zhu

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of YOLO variants for underwater object detection using limited annotated data.
  • Evaluated four YOLO variants (YOLOv8n, YOLOv10n, YOLOv11n, YOLOv13n) on two public datasets.
  • Assessed detection accuracy, computational efficiency, and inference speed.
  • Utilized COCO pre-trained weights for transfer learning.
  • Compared optimizer performance between SGD and AdamW.
  • YOLOv8n achieved the fastest inference speed of 60.98 FPS with a mAP50 of 0.906.
  • YOLOv11n provided the best balance, with a recall of 0.859 and mAP50 of 0.917.
  • YOLOv13n showed high precision at 0.993 and mAP75 of 0.760.
  • Transfer learning improved performance, with mAP50:95 gains exceeding 54% on the challenging dataset.
  • SGD generally outperformed AdamW as the optimizer.

Abstract

Side-scan sonar is essential to underwater target detection, yet its effectiveness is hindered by scarce annotated data and complex acoustic artifacts. This study systematically evaluates four YOLO variants, YOLOv8n, YOLOv10n, YOLOv11n, and the newly released YOLOv13n, on two public side-scan sonar datasets with limited samples and severe class imbalance. We assess detection accuracy, computational efficiency, inference speed, and transfer learning using COCO pre-trained weights, as well as the impact of optimizer choice between SGD and AdamW. The results reveal distinct strengths: YOLOv8n achieves the fastest inference at 60.98 FPS, with a competitive mAP50 of 0.906, ideal for real-time applications. YOLOv11n offers the best accuracy–efficiency balance, attaining the highest recall of 0.859 and mAP50 of 0.917. YOLOv13n demonstrates exceptional precision of 0.993 and high-IoU localization, with an mAP75 of 0.760. Transfer learning consistently boosts performance, with average mAP50:95 gains exceeding 54% on the more challenging dataset, highlighting its critical role in overcoming data scarcity. SGD generally outperforms AdamW, confirming its suitability as the default optimizer. These findings provide practical guidelines: YOLOv8 for real-time needs, YOLOv11 for balanced performance, and YOLOv13 for precision-critical tasks with ample resources. This work also establishes a benchmark for future underwater autonomous system research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42ae4e9516ffd37a32d6https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14060550
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper