PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Journal of Intensive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption therapy in sepsis: a propensity score-matched analysis

RHRyo HisamuneKYKazuma YamakawaTNTomoyuki Nakamura

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption therapy in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes in sepsis patients.
  • Conducted a retrospective comparative analysis using a multicenter dataset.
  • Involved propensity score matching to compare G1-DHP recipients with controls from three separate datasets.
  • Primary outcome measured was 28-day mortality.
  • Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free and ICU-free periods, along with organ dysfunction scores.
  • The G-1 trial group had significantly lower 28-day mortality rates compared to all control datasets.
  • Patients in the G-1 trial had longer ventilator-free periods and a trend toward extended ICU-free periods.
  • G1-DHP was associated with notable improvements in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores by day 7.

Abstract

Abstract Background Granulocyte and monocyte adsorption therapy has been explored as an adjunctive treatment for sepsis due to its potential to modulate excessive systemic inflammation. However, clinical evidence characterizing its real-world use for sepsis remains limited. This study aimed to conduct an exploratory comparative assessment of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis-direct hemoperfusion (G1-DHP) in patients with sepsis. Methods We conducted a retrospective comparative study using a prospective multicenter dataset of patients treated with G1-DHP (G-1 trial) and three independent sepsis datasets (Japan Septic Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation JSEPTIC-DIC, Focused Outcomes Research in Emergency Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis, and Trauma FORECAST, and Japan Medical Data Center JMDC) as controls. Propensity score matching was performed using one-to-one nearest-neighbor matching. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free period, intensive care unit (ICU)-free period, and improvements in organ dysfunction scores. Ordinal logistic regression and linear regression were used based on outcome characteristics. Results After matching, the cohorts included 71, 72, and 68 patient pairs for comparisons with JSEPTIC-DIC, FORECAST, and JMDC, respectively. 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the G-1 trial across all matched datasets (G-1 trial vs. JSEPTIC-DIC: 5.6% vs. 23%; G-1 trial vs. FORECAST: 5.6% vs. 28%; G-1 trial vs. JMDC: 5.9% vs. 38%, all P < 0.01). The G-1 trial had a significantly longer ventilator-free period and a trend toward a longer ICU-free period. G1-DHP was also associated with greater observed improvement in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by day 7 in comparison to controls. Improvements in liver and coagulation SOFA subscores were particularly notable. Conclusions In this multi-dataset analysis, patients treated with G1-DHP showed lower mortality and more favorable clinical outcomes in comparison to external controls. These exploratory findings provide preliminary insights into the potential role of G1-DHP as an immunomodulatory approach in sepsis and warrant further evaluation in prospective studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hisamune et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42ae4e9516ffd37a3336https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-026-00872-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper