PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026ANZ Journal of Surgery0 citations

Click, Watch, Consent: Assessing the Quality of YouTube Information on Ivor‐Lewis Oesophagectomy

View Full Paper
AAAayaz AlamARAadil RahimCBClare Bouffler

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the quality of YouTube information regarding Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomies for patient education.
  • Conducted a YouTube search with the term 'Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy' in May 2025.
  • Selected videos were evaluated based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Quality was assessed using the DISCERN tool and Global Quality Score (GQS).
  • 226 videos were initially assessed based on set criteria, with only 12 qualifying for analysis.
  • The median view count for the eligible videos was 10,961 views.
  • The median DISCERN score was 52.5 out of 80, indicating overall poor quality.
  • The highest median DISCERN score (58/80) was from videos by medical institutions.
  • The median GQS score was 4, further suggesting inadequate quality.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims With modern healthcare now shifting towards a more patient‐centred approach, informed consent and expectation management relies on both easily accessible and accurate information. YouTube is a popular source of medical information for patients, but its lack of regulation, especially on procedures like Ivor‐Lewis oesophagectomies, warrants analysis of the quality of content available. This study aims to assess the quality of information on YouTube related to the Ivor‐Lewis oesophagectomy for patient education. Methods A search of YouTube ( www.youtube.com ) videos was conducted in May 2025 with the term ‘Ivor‐Lewis oesophagectomy’. The inclusion criteria required the videos to discuss Ivor‐Lewis oesophagectomies, be narrated/subtitled in English, intended for patients and educational in nature. The exclusion criteria removed videos that were non‐English, technical surgical videos aimed at healthcare providers, and promotional videos. The videos were evaluated using the DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS) and other descriptive statistics. Results A total of 226 videos were assessed against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve videos were deemed eligible as per the criteria and were included for analysis. The median view count was 10 961 views and the median length of the videos were 162 s. The median DISCERN score was 52.5/80 with medical institutions garnering the highest median out of all the source categories (58/80). The median GQS score was 4 points. Conclusion YouTube videos on Ivor‐Lewis oesophagectomies were largely of poor quality, indicating greater need for regulation and standards for medical information on video‐hosting platforms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba42cf4e9516ffd37a3643https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70539
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper