PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports0 citationsOpen Access

Instantaneous and Cumulative Knee Joint Loading in Cycling With and Without Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

View Full Paper
JEJonas EbbeckeLHLasse Bremholm HansenJVJosef Viellehner

Key Points

  • This study aims to examine the instantaneous and cumulative knee joint loading in cyclists with and without medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
  • Examined 56 recreational cyclists: 19 with KOA, 19 age-matched controls, 18 younger controls.
  • Measured knee moments using 3D kinematics and pedal reaction forces during cycling at three cadences (60/80/100 rpm) and three power outputs (157/210/261W).
  • Used mixed-effects linear models to analyze the relationship between crank torque, power, and cadence with respect to knee loading.
  • Crank torque was the primary driver of instantaneous knee loading moments (all p < 0.001).
  • Cyclists with KOA showed heightened sensitivity to crank torque in the knee adduction moment compared to controls (all p ≤ 0.01).
  • Higher cadence at constant power led to increased cumulative knee load for KOA cyclists, particularly in knee extension moment (p < 0.001).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is characterized by altered joint loading that accelerates disease progression. Cycling is often recommended as a low‐impact exercise, yet the instantaneous and cumulative determinants of knee joint loading remain unclear. This study examined cyclists with and without KOA to characterize how power, cadence, and crank torque relate to knee load during cycling. Fifty‐six recreational cyclists (19 KOA, 19 age‐matched controls (CO), 18 younger controls (CY)) performed 3 cadences (60/80/100 rpm) at 3 power outputs (157/210/261W). Three‐dimensional kinematics and pedal reaction forces were used to compute knee moments via inverse dynamics. Instantaneous loading was quantified as peak knee adduction (KAM peak ), flexion (KFM peak ), and extension (KEM peak ) moments. Cumulative exposure was assessed using fatigue‐weighted cumulative knee load (wCKL KAM , wCKL KFM , wCKL KEM ) normalized to 1 h of cycling. Mixed‐effects linear models tested the effects of crank torque, power, and cadence on instantaneous and cumulative load. Crank torque best explained all instantaneous moments (all p < 0.001). KOA showed larger positive sensitivity to crank torque in KAM peak than both control groups, but smaller torque‐related increases in KFM peak (all p ≤ 0.01). For cumulative loading, power best explained wCKL KAM and wCKL KFM , where opposing effects of instantaneous load and cycle count cancel the net effect of cadence. However, higher cadence at a given power was associated with greater wCKL KEM , particularly in KOA ( p < 0.001). These results show that crank torque drives instantaneous knee loading, while power output and cadence govern cumulative exposure, highlighting the added value of cumulative metrics for characterizing differences in knee joint loading patterns between cyclists with and without KOA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ebbecke et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba431a4e9516ffd37a4048https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70259
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper