PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026CEAS Aeronautical Journal2 citationsOpen Access

Atmospheric testing of hydrogen fuel injectors for RQL combustion within the Rolls-Royce Pearl 15 hydrogen demonstrator engine program

JBJohannes BergerTBThomas BehrendtSESebastián Eisenring

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the flame stabilization and mixing performance of hydrogen fuel injectors under rich-quench-lean combustion conditions.
  • Testing five hydrogen injectors at atmospheric pressure under combustor-like conditions.
  • Utilization of infrared and ultraviolet cameras to capture water vapor and OH* radiation.
  • Performance evaluation of different variants designed for optimal fuel and air mixing.
  • All injectors successfully stabilized under both lean and rich test conditions.
  • Flame stabilization was primarily observed in the inner and outer recirculation zones.
  • Designs aimed at enhancing mixing achieved their objectives, with variant 3 producing a distinct V-shaped flame.

Abstract

Abstract Five swirl stabilized hydrogen injectors for aviation propulsion rich-quench-lean combustion were provided by Rolls-Royce Deutschland to the DLR Institute of Propulsion Technology. The injectors are tested at atmospheric pressure and combustor-like test conditions. Cameras in the infrared and ultraviolet wavelengths are applied to record water-vapor and OH* radiation respectively. The images are averaged, deconvoluted and overlaid. All injectors are found to stabilize at lean and rich test conditions. Flame stabilization was observed in the shear layer of the inner recirculation zone and, in some cases, in the shear layer of the outer recirculation. In variant 1 and 2, the fuel is introduced within two air flows and interacts with both. Fast mixing of air and fuel was the design objective. Variant 3–5 are designed to achieve locally fuel rich and thus colder regions. Variant 3 is designed for centrally injected low velocity fuel and produces a V-shaped flame. Variant 4 and 5 also feature a central fuel injection, but with a radial velocity component. Fuel and air mix more intense than in V3 and distinct combustion brushes form. Variant 2 and 5 are shown with a shortened seal which eliminates flame anchoring on the seal, but also removed the flow widening effect. Based on the experimental results, it is concluded that hydrogen flames stabilize well in a kerosene-derived swirl injector with high blow-off resilience. The objective of good mixing for variant 1 and 2 was achieved, likewise locally fuel rich regions created for variant 3–5.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berger et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba431a4e9516ffd37a407chttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-026-00959-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper