PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Heart1 citations

Prehabilitation in cardiac surgery: a state-of-the-art review

View Full Paper
BGBen GibbisonMPMaria PufuleteRMRebecca Maier

Key Result

Multimodal prehabilitation in cardiac surgery currently lacks high-quality, sufficiently powered trials to definitively establish its clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the role of prehabilitation in improving outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • Review existing literature on prehabilitation strategies in cardiac surgery.
  • Identify the three key components of prehabilitation: exercise, nutrition, and psychological support.
  • Discuss implementation challenges and behavioral considerations in a cardiac surgery context.
  • Prehabilitation has shown promise in non-cardiac surgeries but lacks widespread application in cardiac procedures.
  • Challenges include patients' low cardiorespiratory fitness and high frailty rates, complicating prehabilitation implementation.
  • Few high-quality trials exist, but new large-scale studies are planned to assess effectiveness and cost.

Structured PICO

Does prehabilitation improve postoperative outcomes in candidates for cardiac surgery?

P
Population
Candidates for cardiac surgery
I
Intervention
Prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional, and psychological components)

While prehabilitation is well-established in non-cardiac surgery, its clinical and cost-effectiveness in cardiac surgery remains to be determined by upcoming large-scale pragmatic trials.

Limitations

  • Few high-quality, sufficiently powered trials have evaluated multimodal prehabilitation strategies in cardiac surgery.

Abstract

Prehabilitation aims to improve postoperative outcomes by enhancing patients’ physical and psychological resilience prior to surgery. It comprises three ‘pillars’—exercise, nutritional and psychological components. Although well established in major non-cardiac surgery, prehabilitation has not been widely implemented in cardiac surgery. Candidates for cardiac surgery present unique challenges, including reduced cardiorespiratory fitness and high prevalence of frailty. Additionally, the dual care pathway differs markedly between elective outpatients and acutely admitted inpatients, with implications for timing, feasibility of the prehabilitation, as well as the components within it. Effective implementation is also dependent on behavioural considerations—wrapping the three pillars in a behavioural framework offers the best chance of an effective intervention. Despite biological plausibility and supportive signals from individual components, few high-quality, sufficiently powered trials have evaluated multimodal prehabilitation strategies in cardiac surgery. Large-scale pragmatic trials are beginning to be designed that will determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation in cardiac surgery. The outcomes of these will determine whether the potentially costly intervention of prehabilitation should be rolled out by healthcare providers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gibbison et al. (2026) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery. Prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional, and psychological components) was evaluated. Multimodal prehabilitation in cardiac surgery currently lacks high-quality, sufficiently powered trials to definitively establish its clinical and cost-effectiveness.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba434a4e9516ffd37a4568https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326769
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper