PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The taxonomy of intelligence under modal discipline: a critical–propositional analysis of The Taxonomy of Intelligence: Phase-Coherent Systems in Resonant Coherence Field Theory (RCFT), by Ricardo Miguel Machado Fernandes, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • The aim is to critically analyze Fernandes’s Taxonomy of Intelligence within the framework of the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Conducted a critical-propositional examination of Fernandes's framework.
  • Analyzed key concepts such as coherence, recursion, and symbolic transmission.
  • Engaged in a structured dialogue with foundational literature in Theory of Objectivity.
  • Identified tensions between Resonant Coherence Field Theory and the modal discipline of Theory of Objectivity.
  • Proposed a reinterpretation of intelligence as preserving objective coherence through informational radiations.
  • Highlighted the need for deeper modal grounding in describing intelligence structures.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Ricardo Miguel Machado Fernandes’s The Taxonomy of Intelligence: Phase-Coherent Systems in Resonant Coherence Field Theory (RCFT) in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study analyzes Fernandes’s proposal that intelligence should be understood not as a property restricted to brains, logic, or computation, but as a coherence-preserving and coherence-restructuring behavior manifested across biological, symbolic, ecological, ritual, and field-based systems. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, the article argues that Fernandes’s framework offers important phenomenological and ontological intuitions, especially in its emphasis on relation, boundary, recursion, memory, symbolic transmission, and informational conservation. In this sense, the taxonomy of intelligence is read as a broad map of distributed coherence behaviors that can be fruitfully articulated with the phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmogenic theorem, and cosmological Eras of TO. At the same time, the article identifies decisive tensions. While RCFT and FCI provide a rich language for describing field dynamics, resonance, and conserved information, they do not yet fully satisfy the modal discipline required by TO. The study therefore argues that the article under analysis is strongest as an enlarged phenomenology of intelligences, but still requires a deeper modal grounding concerning the origin and necessity of field, coherence, information, and symbolic structures. The paper develops this confrontation through a structured dialogue with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal and testability-oriented developments, and a broader bibliography of support and dialogue in physics, philosophy, systems theory, and cosmology. It concludes by proposing a TO-based reinterpretation of intelligence as the recursive preservation of objective coherence through the reorganization of informational radiations produced in atomic relations. An appendix in TO style is included at the end, offering modal propositions, corollaries, and a provisional classificatory scheme for primary, derived, symbolic, and coherence-related intelligences. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; intelligence; Resonant Coherence Field Theory; RCFT; Fundamental Conservation of Information; FCI; modal ontology; coherence; information; phenomenology; cosmology; symbolic intelligence; recursive systems; Inductive Effects; Zenodo.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43884e9516ffd37a4e86https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19057391
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper