PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Liquid digestate treatment potential of five green microalgae in non-axenic cultures

ESEwelina SobolewskaSBSebastian BorowskiPNPaulina Nowicka-Krawczyk

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the nutrient removal efficiency of five microalgae species in liquid digestate under varying pH conditions.
  • Cultivated five microalgal species in non-axenic cultures for 120 days
  • Conducted experiments in two phases: Phase 1 without pH control and Phase 2 with pH adjustment
  • Measured removal rates of total nitrogen (TN) and orthophosphate (PO₄³⁻)
  • Analyzed microalgal density and bacterial community structure
  • Phase 1 achieved a TN removal rate of 69.7% for Desmodesmus communis
  • Phase 2 improved TN removal for Desmodesmus communis to 89.4% and PO₄³⁻ removal to 93.8%
  • Tetradesmus obliquus and Chlorella sorokiniana had the lowest TN reduction rates
  • pH adjustment significantly increased microalgal density and altered bacterial community composition

Abstract

The research examined the growth of non-axenic microalgal cultures in liquid digestate for the removal of nutrients and organic contaminants. Five environmental isolates (Chlorella sorokiniana, Tetradesmus obliquus, Desmodesmus subspicatus, Chloroidium saccharophilum, Desmodesmus communis) were cultivated for a period of 120 days comprising two operational phases: Phase 1 without pH control and Phase 2 with pH adjustment. In Phase 1, the microalgal-bacterial cultures achieved up to 69.7 ± 5.1% of total nitrogen (TN) reduction rate, while orthophosphate (PO₄³⁻) removal reached only 46.5 ± 3.8%. In contrast, the pH adjustment in Phase 2 had a dramatic effect on the microalgae growth and treatment efficiency: the TN and orthophosphate removal rates were significantly higher, whereas sCOD reduction lowered. Among the tested non‑axenic cultures, the trials inoculated with Desmodesmus communis achieved the highest overall TN removal rates in both phases (69.7 ± 5.1% in Phase 1 and 89.4 ± 0.8% in Phase 2), whereas PO₄³⁻ reduction was relatively low in Phase 1 but reached 93.8 ± 0.3% in Phase 2. By contrast, cultures inoculated with Tetradesmus obliquus and Chlorella sorokiniana consistently exhibited the lowest TN reduction rates (55.4 ± 1.7–57.9 ± 5.8% in Phase 1 and 85.2 ± 1.6–85.8 ± 1.0% in Phase 2). By comparison, Desmodesmus subspicatus generally performed best in terms of sCOD reduction (69.0 ± 1.9–75.2 ± 0.7%). The pH adjustment significantly increased the density of microalgal coenobia and chlorophyll a concentration and also led to considerable changes in the relative abundance of bacteria. In Phase 1 three bacterial phyla dominated the non‑axenic cultures: Proteobacteria (40.9–75.0%), Bacteroidota (11.5–19.3%) and Actinobacteriota (2.9–27.1%). In Phase 2, NaOH‑driven pH increase clearly restructured the bacterial community: Proteobacteria remained dominant (59.0–78.4%), Bacteroidota declined markedly (1.5–9.0%), and Firmicutes became the second most abundant phylum (2.1–30.4%), while Actinobacteriota were strongly reduced. Overall, the removal of nutrients and organic pollutants was not solely attributable to microalgal activity but likely resulted from complex interactions within the microalgal–bacterial consortia under the contrasting pH regimes of Phases 1 and 2.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sobolewska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37adcb34aaaeb1a67cb7dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45636-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biofilm and suspension-based cultivation of microalgae to treat anaerobic digestate food effluent (ADFE)2024 · 28 citations
  2. 2Unsterilized sewage treatment and carbohydrate accumulation in Tetradesmus obliquus PF3 with CO2 supplementation2019 · 47 citations
  3. 3Heterotrophic nitrification–aerobic denitrification by novel isolated bacteria2010 · 207 citations
  4. 4Cultivation of algae consortium in a dairy farm wastewater for biodiesel production2015 · 242 citations
  5. 5Microalgae consortia cultivation in dairy wastewater to improve the potential of nutrient removal and biodiesel feedstock production2016 · 162 citations