PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Yang-Mills Mass Gap via Spectral-Fractal Theory A Conditional Proof and Research Program

View Full Paper
TMThierry MarechalF5 Networks (United States)

Key Points

  • This work aims to develop a spectral-fractal approach to solve the Yang-Mills Mass Gap problem, a prominent unsolved issue in theoretical physics.
  • Constructed a gauge-invariant kinetic operator incorporating a fractal potential at dimension √2.
  • Utilized analytic construction techniques, including Mourre estimates and trace-class bounds.
  • Identified topological mechanisms for confinement via vortex percolation and Wilson loops.
  • Proved that the constructed operator has a strictly positive spectral gap.
  • Identified empirical relationships in lattice QCD suggesting √2-periodicity in glueball mass ratios.
  • Outlined five gaps remaining in the research to achieve a rigorous understanding of the Yang-Mills dynamics.

Abstract

We develop a spectral-fractal approach to the Yang-Mills Mass Gap problem — one of the seven Clay Millennium Prize Problems — structured as a conditional proof plus a constructive research program. The conditional component: given a well-defined physical Hilbert space Hₚhys satisfying standard axioms (Wightman or Osterwalder-Schrader), we construct a gauge-invariant kinetic operator HYM incorporating a fractal potential at the variationally emergent dimension Df = √2, and prove that this operator has a strictly positive spectral gap. The proof is organized around three pillars: (I) analytic construction with gauge-covariant Mourre estimates, trace-class bounds, and parametrix expansion uniform in spatial cutoff; (II) geometric Yang-Mills Boundary Variety with cohomological mass gap forcing via non-exactness of a gauge-invariant spectral 1-form; (III) topological identification of confinement through center vortex percolation at fractal dimension √2, producing area law for Wilson loops and linear quark-antiquark potential with string tension σ = m₀²/ (√2π). The Bridge Theorem ensures all conclusions are independent of gauge-fixing procedures, resolving the Gribov problem within the framework. The constructive component (Selberg-DAM program): we identify a concrete path to construct Hₚhys via finite-dimensional attractor reduction. If the Yang-Mills dynamics admits a finite-dimensional attractor in configuration space, the problem converts from Type B (target Hilbert space undefined) to Type A (bridge problem), where the conditional proof applies. The attractor existence remains the key open conjecture. A key empirical observation motivates the entire program: published lattice QCD data (Morningstar-Peardon 1999) exhibit √2-periodic glueball mass ratios — m (2⁺⁺) /m (0⁺⁺) = 1. 39 ± 0. 05 ≈ √2 and m (3⁺⁺) /m (0⁺⁺) = 2. 06 ≈ (√2) ² — computed independently of and 25 years prior to this framework. The mass formula m₀ = ΛYM · (√2) ^3/ (11N) predicts the ratio structure; the absolute scale uses ΛYM as input. Five technical gaps are explicitly identified in decreasing order of severity: (1) the constructive gap — rigorous construction of Hₚhys (the foundational obstruction shared by all approaches) ; (2) numerical dependence in the energy-resonance balance; (3) calibration using lattice QCD scale as input; (4) estimated rather than rigorous percolation thresholds in 4D; (5) attractor existence for the Selberg-DAM program. This document does not claim to solve the Clay Millennium Problem — it provides a conditional proof, identifies precisely what remains open, and proposes a research program to close the gaps. Eight companion appendices provide technical details: √2-Emergence (variational proof of optimal fractal dimension), Localized Mourre Estimates (spectral analysis backbone), Boundary Variety (cohomological construction), Bridge Theorem (gauge independence), Confinement Mechanism (center vortex percolation), RG Flow Analysis (asymptotic freedom stability), Topological Forcing (instanton/monopole/vortex coherence), and Computational Verification (proposed protocols for lattice QCD confirmation). All appendix results are conditional on Gap 1.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thierry Marechal (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37afeb34aaaeb1a67d02chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19186567
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper