PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Case Studies in Thermal Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

A novel dual-additive strategy for cleaner diesel combustion: The combined effects of diethyl carbonate and limonene on energy conversion, combustion dynamics, and emission behavior

View Full Paper
HSHuseyin Sevinc

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the effects of diethyl carbonate and limonene on diesel combustion performance and emissions.
  • Experimental study using a single-cylinder diesel engine
  • Testing four fuel blends (D100, D90DEC10, D90LM10, D90DEC5LM5)
  • Assessing combustion parameters including in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate
  • Measuring emissions such as CO, HC, and NO x
  • D90LM10 showed a 15.9% reduction in brake specific fuel consumption
  • D90LM10 achieved an 18.5% increase in brake thermal efficiency
  • Significant CO emissions reduction of 48.4% with D90LM10
  • D90DEC10 resulted in a 32.6% decrease in smoke emissions
  • Thermographic analysis showed surface temperature reductions for all blends compared to neat diesel

Abstract

This experimental study investigates how dual-additive fuel blending affects combustion, thermal response, performance, and emissions in a small-scale diesel engine. Diethyl carbonate (DEC) and bio-derived limonene were used as oxygenated and renewable additives, and four fuels (D100, D90DEC10, D90LM10, and D90DEC5LM5) were tested in a single-cylinder diesel engine at 2000 rpm under loads of 1–3 kW. Combustion and thermal analyses included in-cylinder pressure, heat release rate (HRR), combustion duration, vibration, noise, exhaust gas temperature (EGT), and infrared thermography. Among the tested fuels, D90LM10 exhibited the most pronounced premixed combustion behavior and delivered the best overall performance, with an average 15.9% reduction in brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), an 18.5% increase in brake thermal efficiency (BTE), a 48.4% decrease in CO emissions, up to a 23% reduction in HC emissions, and nearly a 70% reduction in smoke opacity relative to neat diesel. In contrast, D90DEC10 moderated pressure rise and heat-release intensity, yielding the lowest average vibration amplitude (4.4% lower than diesel), a 32.6% reduction in smoke emissions, and a moderate 4–5% decrease in NO X . The dual-additive blend D90DEC5LM5 provided a balanced response, with 6.3% lower BSFC, 9.2% higher BTE, 26.5% lower CO emissions, and 40–45% lower smoke opacity than diesel. Thermographic analysis at full load showed surface temperature reductions of 4.3%, 10.7%, and 6.5% for D90DEC10, D90LM10, and D90DEC5LM5, respectively. Overall, DEC–limonene blending offers an effective route for improving diesel-engine efficiency while reducing vibration, thermal stress, and major exhaust pollutants.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huseyin Sevinc (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b41b34aaaeb1a67d8eehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.107969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper