PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 25, 2026Journal of Alzheimer s Disease0 citations

Composite scores to detect and monitor cognitive dysfunction in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A narrative review

View Full Paper
BTBhargav TallapragadaSMShaun MarkovicKMKieran J. Marston

Key Points

  • The review aims to evaluate the development and effectiveness of cognitive composites in detecting Alzheimer's-related cognitive changes.
  • Reviewed cognitive composites for Alzheimer's detection and monitoring.
  • Evaluated using criteria such as cognitive domains and neuropsychological tests.
  • Considered inclusion of non-neuropsychological measures and statistical methods used.
  • Proposed a standard framework for validation.
  • Cognitive composites show greater sensitivity to cognitive changes than individual tests.
  • Two categories of composites identified: domain-specific and general.
  • Inconsistencies in psychometric reporting were noted across studies.
  • A standardized validation framework was suggested to improve assessment practices.

Abstract

Cognitive composites combine scores from multiple neuropsychological tests and demonstrate greater sensitivity to Alzheimer's disease (AD) related cognitive changes than individual tests. This review examines the development, composition and validity of cognitive composites to detect AD-related cognitive changes. The included cognitive composites were evaluated using four criteria: cognitive domains assessed; neuropsychological tests used, the inclusion of non-neuropsychological measures (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination) that produce a global score themselves; and statistical methods used to calculate the composite. Existing composites fall into two categories: domain-specific (e.g., episodic memory, executive function, attention) or general composites combining multiple cognitive domains while incorporating clinical and functional measures. Psychometric properties were not consistently reported across all the studies. Therefore, a standardized validation framework is proposed to address these inconsistencies. Future work should focus on systematically evaluating optimized weighting, including data from clinical and functional measures and consistent psychometric reporting for assessing and monitoring cognitive dysfunction in early AD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tallapragada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37b93b34aaaeb1a67e2bchttps://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261433044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper