Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 25, 2026Medical EducationOpen Access

Reprioritising consultation in scoping reviews: Clarifying purposes and practices

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MZMarco ZaccagniniLMLauren A. MaggioCSChristina St‐Onge

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This manuscript reexamines consultation in scoping reviews, suggesting a more integral role to enhance relevance and quality.

Key Points

  • To clarify the role of consultation in scoping reviews and advocate for its methodological integration.
  • Revisiting the existing literature on consultation in scoping reviews
  • Offering practical guidance for effective consultation design and execution
  • Using case examples to illustrate successful consultation practices
  • Consultation significantly enhances the credibility and usability of findings in scoping reviews.
  • A strategic approach to consultation improves stakeholder engagement and relevance of outcomes.
  • The paper emphasizes the need for transparency and reflexivity in the consultation process.

Cite This Study

Zaccagnini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c37be2b34aaaeb1a67ec32https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70211
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Scoping reviews: an approach to co-creation through consultation2024
  2. 2An Indigenous-informed scoping review study methodology: advancing the science of scoping reviews2024 · 15 citations
  3. 3Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework2005 · 37,462 citations
  4. 4ABC of a Scoping Review: A Simplified JBI Scoping Review Guideline2024 · 90 citations
  5. 5Prioritising methodological research questions for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps for health research: a protocol for PROSPECT Delphi study2025