PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Keisan Rikigaku Koenkai koen ronbunshu/Keisan Rikigaku Kouenkai kouen rombunshuu0 citationsOpen Access

Effective combination of surrogate models and dimensionality reduction techniques for high-dimensional uncertainty quantification

View Full Paper
TITaisuke ICHIMARUKSKoji Shimoyama

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the effectiveness of combining surrogate models with dimensionality reduction for uncertainty quantification.
  • Compared the Monte Carlo method with four combinations of surrogate models and dimensionality reduction techniques.
  • Utilized benchmark test functions for performance assessment.
  • Evaluated computational costs and accuracy in uncertainty quantification.
  • Combined approaches showed improved efficiency in uncertainty quantification.
  • Training surrogate models and dimensionality reduction methods together outperformed their individual use.
  • Notable reduction in samples required for accurate representation of high-dimensional uncertainties.

Abstract

The Monte Carlo (MC) method is most exact but computationally expensive for uncertainty quantification (UQ). Instead, surrogate models can approximate UQ at a lower computational cost. However, as the input uncertainty dimensionality increases, the number of samples required to construct the surrogate models also increases rapidly; thus, the advantage of using surrogate models disappears. Therefore, it is necessary to combine the surrogate models with dimensionality reduction for effective UQ. This study compares the performance of UQ for the direct MC method and four different combinations of surrogate models and dimensionality reduction methods in benchmark test functions. The results clarify the effectiveness of training a surrogate model and a dimensionality reduction technique simultaneously rather than separately.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

ICHIMARU et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cc85fdc3bde448917ddehttps://doi.org/10.1299/jsmecmd.2025.38.os5-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Sample-Efficient Moment-Matching Monte Carlo (MM-MC) Framework for Ultra High-Dimensional Uncertainty Analysis2026
  2. 2A Sample-Efficient Moment-Matching Monte Carlo (MM-MC) Framework for Ultra High-Dimensional Uncertainty Analysis2026
  3. 3Surrogate modeling for uncertainty quantification in nonlinear dynamics2025
  4. 4Robust Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformalised Monte Carlo Prediction2024 · 21 citations
  5. 5An active-subspace-enhanced support vector regression model for high-dimensional uncertainty quantification2024 · 1 citations