PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 26, 2026Insects0 citationsOpen Access

Optimizing UV-A Solar-Powered Lights to Enhance Lures for Codling Moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

View Full Paper
AKAlan Lee KnightEBEsteban Basoalto

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how UV-A LED lights can enhance the effectiveness of lures for codling moths in traps.
  • Conducted field trials to assess trap performance with different lure types and LED parameters
  • Used sex pheromone lure (PH1X) and non-pheromone lure (CM4K)
  • Measured efficacy of traps with LEDs at peak 395 nm and varying irradiance levels
  • Traps with UV-A LEDs increased moth catches 7- and 3-fold in July and August, respectively
  • Higher intensity lights attracted more non-target species without increasing codling moth catches early in the season
  • Smaller traps had greater irradiance but captured fewer codling moths than delta traps without LEDs

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to define several parameters associated with adding LEDs to monitoring traps for codling moth (CM), Cydia pomonella (L.), using both a sex pheromone lure (PH1X) and a non-pheromone lure (CM4K). Traps with LEDs emitting at a peak of 395 nm with 1000–2000 mW/m2 were the most effective. Lights with greater intensities caught similar numbers of CMs and significantly more non-targets. Adding the UV-A lights did not increase moth catches early in the season with either the PH1X or CM4K lures. However, UV-A LEDs, when used with these two lures, significantly increased total moth catches 7- and 3-fold in July and August, respectively. The addition of the UV-A LEDs allowed CM4K-baited traps to perform significantly better in previously limiting situations, such as in weedy orchards, and in pear relative to apple. Distance from the light source is a key factor affecting light energy. Irradiance dropped >90% at 15 cm, which is the distance from the lure to the entrance of a standard delta trap. A smaller trap (7.5 cm radius) had a 4-fold greater irradiance at its entrance and caught greater numbers of non-targets but not CMs than delta traps without LEDs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knight et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c4cd25fdc3bde448919081https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17040354
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper