PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 28, 2026Fuels0 citationsOpen Access

Linking Sandpack Tests and CFD: How Vibration-Induced Permeability Heterogeneity Shapes Waterflood Sweep and Oil Recovery

View Full Paper
ZZZhengyuan ZhangSLShixuan LuLDLiming Dai

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how vibration-induced changes in permeability affect oil recovery during water flooding.
  • Combined sandpack tests and Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) simulations
  • Tested heavy oil sandpacks under varying vibration frequencies
  • Calibrated VOF model using measured injection pressure and oil production data
  • Assigned permeability distributions and evaluated their impact on pressure and production
  • Executed parameter sweeps to analyze sensitivity to permeability variability
  • Model successfully reproduced important pressure spikes and production behaviors under specific permeability conditions
  • Showed that negative correlation between axial and radial permeabilities is crucial for accurate predictions
  • Identified key factors that influence oil recovery and sweep efficiency
  • Proposed a new workflow for optimizing vibration conditions before field deployment

Abstract

Vibration-assisted water flooding (VA-WF) can improve sweep efficiency. However, unclear macro-scale mechanisms limit its wider adoption in heavy oil reservoirs. This study combines previous sandpack experiments with two-dimensional Volume-of-Fluid (VOF) simulations to show how vibrations reshape permeability fields and, in turn, pressure and production behaviour. Heavy oil sandpacks were water-flooded under conditions of no vibration and 2 Hz and 5 Hz axial excitation. Measured injection pressure histories and oil production were used to calibrate a VOF model in which absolute permeability follows a log-normal distribution with directional anisotropy. Only when axial and radial permeabilities were assigned a negative local correlation did the model reproduce key observations: secondary pressure spikes, irregular viscous-fingering morphologies, delayed production drops, and variability in cumulative recovery. Parameter sweeps quantify the sensitivity of VA-WF performance to the variance and correlation of the permeability field, and multiple runs estimate the variability in outcomes introduced by stochastic heterogeneity. This study proposes a transferable workflow—comprising sample testing, parameter inference, and probabilistic simulation—to screen excitation conditions and forecast VA-WF performance prior to field implementation, enabling operators to optimize vibration frequency based on reservoir-specific permeability characteristics and to anticipate production variability under uncertainty. These results highlight the dominant factors affecting swept volume and oil recovery, supporting data-driven decision making in VA-WF projects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c7724e8bbfbc51511e2abdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fuels7020020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Oil Recovery Through Vibration-Stimulated Waterflooding: Experimental Insights and Mechanisms2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Quantitative prediction of residual wetting film generated in mobilizing a two-phase liquid in a capillary model2015 · 6 citations
  3. 3Perturbation Analysis for the Darcy Problem with Log-Normal Permeability2014 · 23 citations
  4. 4Stress-Dependent Petrophysical Properties of the Bakken Unconventional Petroleum System: Insights from Elastic Wave Velocities and Permeability Measurements2023 · 8 citations
  5. 5Wetting transition and fluid trapping in a microfluidic fracture2023 · 21 citations