PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026International Dental Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Monotonic and Fatigue Strength of 3D-Printed Partially Stabilized Zirconia for Monolithic Restorations

View Full Paper
YLYuqing LuLWLi WangJTJoão Paulo Mendes Tribst

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the monotonic and fatigue strength of 3D-printed 5Y-PSZ and how printing orientation and finishing affect these strengths.
  • 3D-printed specimens created using stereolithography.
  • Divided into groups based on printing layer orientation: parallel or perpendicular.
  • Underwent different surface finishing protocols: as-sintered, polished, and glazed.
  • Monotonic strength tested using a ball-in-hole device.
  • Fatigue tests conducted on polished and glazed specimens.
  • Parallel specimens exhibited higher monotonic strength (640 ± 99 MPa) than perpendicular specimens (507 ± 48 MPa).
  • Polished specimens had greater strength than as-sintered specimens, with parallel reaching up to 782 ± 134 MPa.
  • Glazed specimens showed no significant strength difference between orientations.
  • Fatigue strength was similar across all groups, with values around 400 MPa.

Abstract

To investigate the monotonic and fatigue strength of 3D-printed 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconia (5Y-PSZ) and the influences of printing layer orientation and finishing protocol. Bar-shaped 5Y-PSZ specimens (1.0 mm x 1.0 mm x 12.0 mm) were 3D-printed via stereolithography, followed by debinding and sintering. The specimens were randomly divided into 2 groups according to printing layer orientations: parallel or perpendicular to the tensile surface of a 3-point bending test. The specimens of each printing layer orientation were subsequently submitted to different surface finishing protocols: as-sintered, polished, and glazed. The monotonic strength of each group was determined using a ball-in-hole device. A step-wise fatigue test was conducted for the polished and glazed specimens. For monotonic strength, the parallel specimens (640 ± 99 MPa) were stronger than the perpendicular (507 ± 48 MPa); polishing generated higher strength for both parallel (782 ± 134 MPa) and perpendicular (645 ± 160 MPa) orientations; while the effect of glazing was not significant, the glazed perpendicular specimen (623 ± 97 MPa) presented similar strength to the glazed parallel specimens (581 ± 117 MPa). However, the fatigue strength was similar in the evaluated groups (parallel and polished: 418 ± 115 MPa; perpendicular and polished: 404 ± 55 MPa; parallel and glazed: 406 ± 41 MPa; perpendicular and glazed: 371 ± 86 MPa). Both printing layer orientation and surface finishing influenced the monotonic strength of 3D-printed 5Y-PSZ, while fatigue strength did not differ significantly among polished and glazed specimens with different orientations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094ff0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109529
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper