PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Journal of Nuclear Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Dosimetry Analysis of 177 Lu-PSMA-I&T in Patients with Low-Volume Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the LUNAR Trial

ZEZachary EllsCMCatherine MeyerKKKoichiro Kimura

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to estimate the absorbed doses of Lutetium-177 PSMA-IT in organs and lesions among patients with low-volume prostate cancer.
  • Conducted secondary analysis of phase 2 LUNAR trial data on 45 patients under treatment with Lutetium-177 PSMA-IT.
  • Acquired quantitative SPECT/CT images at specific time intervals post-injection.
  • Segmented various organs using deep learning-assisted techniques and evaluated absorbed doses for these organs and tumor lesions.
  • Employed a voxel-based schema to estimate absorbed doses and corrected for partial-volume effects.
  • Median prostate-specific antigen level among patients was 1.10 ng/mL.
  • Identified a total of 123 lesions with a median of 2 per patient.
  • The absorbed dose to critical organs like kidneys and parotid glands was measured, showing values consistent with previous studies.
  • Demonstrated substantial variability in absorbed dose estimates across different lesions.

Abstract

The phase 2 LUNAR trial randomized (1:1) patients with oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer to neoadjuvant 177LuLu-PSMA-I&T (2 cycles, 6.8 GBq) followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus SBRT alone. 177LuLu-PSMA-I&T before SBRT was well tolerated and significantly improved PSMA PET/CT–based progression-free survival compared with SBRT alone. Here, we report the estimated absorbed doses (AD) of 177LuLu-PSMA-I&T to organs at risk and lesions. Methods: This analysis was conducted on all 45 patients randomized to the investigational arm. Quantitative SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4, 24, and 72–96 h postinjection of cycle 1. Kidneys, salivary and lacrimal glands, and liver were delineated with deep learning–assisted segmentation, whereas lumbar vertebrae were manually segmented as a surrogate for bone marrow. Planned target volumes were transferred from the SBRT plans to the SPECT/CT series. Registration between time points was manually verified for each segmentation. ADs were estimated using a multiple-time-point voxel-based schema. Time–activity data were fit using a monoexponential function. Partial-volume effects were corrected using volume-specific phantom-based recovery coefficients. Results: In the 45 patients included, the median prostate-specific antigen was 1.10 ng/mL (range, 0.16–14.70 ng/mL). In total, 123 lesions total were identified, with a median per patient of 2 (range, 1–9). Median whole-body total tumor volume was 14.5 cm3 (range, 1.9–145.9 cm3). Median SUVmax on baseline PSMA PET/CT and 24-h SPECT/CT was 3.49 (range, 0.59–45.30) and 0.72 (range, 0.02–34.24), respectively. The AD to the kidneys, parotids, submandibulars, lacrimals, liver, and bone marrow were 0.35 ± 0.10, 0.20 ± 0.10, 0.24 ± 0.10, 0.70 ± 0.49, 0.03 ± 0.01, and 0.005 ± 0.002 Gy/GBq, respectively. The mean dose to bone (n = 38), lymph node (n = 82), and soft tissue (n = 3) lesions were 0.19 ± 0.42, 0.46 ± 0.81, and 0.30 ± 0.38 Gy/GBq, respectively. Conclusion: The ADs from 177LuLu-PSMA-I&T to organs at risk were consistent with prior reports, supporting the safety in patients with oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. There was substantial heterogeneity in lesion AD estimates on both inter- and intrapatient levels. Because of the limited spatial resolution of SPECT, partial-volume effects can underestimate the AD in small volumes. Nevertheless, 2 neoadjuvant cycles of 177LuLu-PSMA-I&T before SBRT prolonged progression-free survival, consistent with effective treatment of occult disease beyond imaging detectability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ells et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aefd659487ece0fa4d69https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271467
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper