PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026PLoS ONE2 citationsOpen Access

Clinical impact of broad- versus narrow-spectrum empiric therapy in acute cholangitis: A Japanese claims database study

View Full Paper
KAKazuhiro AotoKyoto Pharmaceutical UniversityRIRyo InoseKyoto Pharmaceutical UniversityYMYuichi MurakiKyoto Pharmaceutical University

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the clinical outcomes of broad-spectrum versus narrow-spectrum empiric therapies in acute cholangitis for hospitalized patients.
  • Evaluated patients diagnosed with acute cholangitis between 2014-2022 using a claims database.
  • Categorized patients into broad-spectrum and narrow-spectrum therapy groups based on antibiotic received.
  • Utilized multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching for analysis.
  • No significant association between broad-spectrum therapy and 30-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.37).
  • Propensity score matching revealed similar findings with no mortality benefit for broad-spectrum therapy.
  • Broad-spectrum group had longer intravenous antibiotic therapy duration and longer hospital stays compared to narrow-spectrum group.

Abstract

The clinical benefit of broad-spectrum empiric therapy in patients with acute cholangitis is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of broad-spectrum and narrow-spectrum empiric therapies on patient outcomes using a Japanese claims database. The study included patients who were diagnosed with acute cholangitis between April 2014 and August 2022, aged 18–99 years, received antibiotics, had blood cultures collected, and underwent biliary drainage. Patients who received empiric therapy with carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, or fourth-generation cephalosporins were included in the broad-spectrum group, whereas others were included in the narrow-spectrum group. Of the 4, 755 eligible patients, 3, 377 were categorized into the narrow-spectrum group and 1, 378 into the broad-spectrum group. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, the presence of sepsis, and intensive care unit admission were associated with increased 30-day in-hospital mortality, whereas the receipt of broad-spectrum empiric therapy was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1. 37 95% confidence interval CI, 0. 84–2. 23). In the propensity score matching analysis, there was also no association between the receipt of broad-spectrum empiric therapy and 30-day in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1. 43 95% CI, 0. 82–2. 50). Furthermore, in the propensity score-matched cohort, the broad-spectrum group had longer duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy (median interquartile range IQR: 8 6 –11 day vs. 9 7 –13 day; difference 1 day 95% CI, 0. 31–1. 69 day) and length of hospital stay (median IQR: 13 9 –20 day vs. 16 11 –25 day; difference 3 day 95% CI, 1. 87–4. 13 day), compared with the narrow-spectrum group. In this large-scale study using a Japanese claims database, broad-spectrum empiric therapy was not associated with improved clinical outcomes, compared with narrow-spectrum empiric therapy. Therefore, the necessity of broad-spectrum empiric therapy may be limited in clinical practice, and narrow-spectrum empiric therapy may represent an effective treatment strategy for acute cholangitis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aoto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aefd659487ece0fa4d71https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346452
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper