PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 4, 2026Biomedicines0 citationsOpen Access

Emerging In Vivo Imaging Modalities for Improved Glioblastoma Surgery and Monitoring

View Full Paper
ODOluwagbenga DadaSSShikshita SinghFSFrancheska Sumadchat

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate emerging imaging technologies for better detection of residual glioblastoma cells during surgery and monitoring.
  • Review of multiple optical imaging modalities for glioblastoma detection
  • Focus on technologies like multi-photon microscopy and near-infrared imaging
  • Discussion of challenges including molecular target availability and blood-brain barrier
  • Emerging imaging methods show potential for improved detection of residual GBM cells
  • Significant limitations persist due to tumor heterogeneity and signal variability
  • Need for integrated imaging strategies to enhance surgical decision making

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with poor survival largely driven by diffuse cellular infiltration, profound heterogeneity, and near-universal recurrence following standard therapy. Although maximizing the extent of resection is a key determinant of patient outcome, current clinical imaging modalities lack the spatial resolution necessary to detect microscopic tumor invasion and therapy-resistant cell populations. Emerging in vivo imaging technologies capable of cellular and near-single-cell resolution have therefore become a major focus in preclinical neuro-oncology research, with growing relevance for surgical guidance, treatment adaptation, and translational discovery. This review evaluates multiple optical imaging modalities, including multi-photon microscopy, near-infrared II fluorescence imaging, bioluminescence imaging, photoacoustic imaging, optical coherence tomography, confocal laser endomicroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, autofluorescence microscopy, and fluorescence macroscopy with a focus on their ability to detect residual GBM cells. Despite significant advances, these approaches remain constrained by limitations in molecular target availability, probe delivery across the blood–brain barrier, and signal variability within heterogeneous tumor regions. The biological complexity of GBM further challenges detection, as residual tumor cells are spatially dispersed and phenotypically diverse, limiting the effectiveness of single-marker or single-modality strategies. Together, these findings highlight the need for integrated, biologically informed imaging approaches to improve detection of residual disease and guide surgical decision making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d0aefd659487ece0fa4ee9https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14040816
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper