PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2022Journal of Dental Research11 citationsOpen Access

Gnas Loss Causes Chondrocyte Fate Conversion in Cranial Suture Formation

View Full Paper
RXRuoshi XuYLYuchen LiuYZYou Lang Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Calvaria development is distinct from limb formation. Craniosynostosis is a skull deformity characterized by premature cranial suture fusion due to the loss of the GNAS gene and, consequently, its encoded protein Gαs. This birth defect requires surgery, with potential lethal consequences. So far, hardly any early-stage nonsurgical interventions for GNAS loss-related craniosynostosis are available. Here, we investigated the role of the Gnas gene in mice in guarding the distinctiveness of intramembranous ossification and how loss of Gnas triggered endochondral-like ossification within the cranial sutures. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of normal neonatal mice cranial suture chondrocytes showed a Hedgehog (Hh) inactivation pattern, which was associated with Gαs signaling activation. Loss of Gnas evoked chondrocyte-to-osteoblast fate conversion and resulted in cartilage heterotopic ossification (HO) within cranial sutures and fontanels of the mouse model, leading to a skull deformity resembling craniosynostosis in patients with loss of GNAS. Activation of ectopic Hh signaling within cranial chondrocytes stimulated the conversion of cell identity through a hypertrophy-like stage, which shared features of endochondral ossification in vivo. Reduction of Gli transcription activity by crossing with a loss-of-function Gli2 allele or injecting GLI1/2 antagonist hindered the progression of cartilage HO in neonatal stage mice. Our study uncovered the role of Gαs in maintaining cranial chondrocyte identity during neonatal calvaria development in mice and how reduction of Hh signaling could be a nonsurgical intervention to reduce skull deformity in craniosynostosis due to loss of GNAS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d72c355dca7d66cbbef160https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221075215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gene bivalency at Polycomb domains regulates cranial neural crest positional identity2017 · 150 citations
  2. 2Establishing and maintaining fertility: the importance of cell cycle arrest2021 · 18 citations
  3. 3Reactivation of the Hedgehog pathway in esophageal progenitors turns on an embryonic-like program to initiate columnar metaplasia2021 · 35 citations
  4. 4Sox9‐expressing precursors are the cellular origin of the cruciate ligament of the knee joint and the limb tendons2010 · 207 citations
  5. 5A radical switch in clonality reveals a stem cell niche in the epiphyseal growth plate2019 · 233 citations