PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2024Nutrients87 citationsOpen Access

Is ChatGPT an Effective Tool for Providing Dietary Advice?

View Full Paper
VPValentina PonzoIGIlaria GoitreEFEnrica Favaro

Structured PICO

Is ChatGPT an effective and accurate tool for providing dietary advice for non-communicable diseases compared to established guidelines?

P
Population
Queries regarding dietary advice for various non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and complex cases with overlapping conditions
I
Intervention
ChatGPT (version 3.5) generated dietary advice
C
Comparator
Established nutritional guidelines
O
Outcome
Appropriateness of dietary advice compared with guidelines, assessed by a panel of nutrition experts

While ChatGPT can provide reasonably accurate general dietary advice for single non-communicable diseases, it cannot safely manage complex cases with overlapping conditions and should not replace professional consultation.

Limitations

  • Efficacy decreased in complex situations necessitating customized strategies

Abstract

The chatbot Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is becoming increasingly popular among patients for searching health-related information. Prior studies have raised concerns regarding accuracy in offering nutritional advice. We investigated in November 2023 ChatGPT's potential as a tool for providing nutritional guidance in relation to different non-communicable diseases (NCDs). First, the dietary advice given by ChatGPT (version 3.5) for various NCDs was compared with guidelines; then, the chatbot's capacity to manage a complex case with several diseases was investigated. A panel of nutrition experts assessed ChatGPT's responses. Overall, ChatGPT offered clear advice, with appropriateness of responses ranging from 55.5% (sarcopenia) to 73.3% (NAFLD). Only two recommendations (one for obesity, one for non-alcoholic-fatty-liver disease) contradicted guidelines. A single suggestion for T2DM was found to be "unsupported", while many recommendations for various NCDs were deemed to be "not fully matched" to the guidelines despite not directly contradicting them. However, when the chatbot handled overlapping conditions, limitations emerged, resulting in some contradictory or inappropriate advice. In conclusion, although ChatGPT exhibited a reasonable accuracy in providing general dietary advice for NCDs, its efficacy decreased in complex situations necessitating customized strategies; therefore, the chatbot is currently unable to replace a healthcare professional's consultation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ponzo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69da2a10ba6014a02e8366d2https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16040469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in liver disease2020 · 374 citations
  2. 2Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group2014 · 1,720 citations
  3. 3The global burden of metabolic disease: Data from 2000 to 20192023 · 800 citations
  4. 4The credibility of dietary advice formulated by ChatGPT: Robo-diets for people with food allergies2023 · 130 citations
  5. 5ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns2023 · 2,910 citations