PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Journal of the American Ceramic Society0 citations

Thermodynamic Reassessment of the Al 2 O 3 –MgO and Al 2 O 3 –CaO–MgO Systems

View Full Paper
FGFengyang GaoYLYuling LiuSWSW Wen

Key Points

  • The aim is to refine the thermodynamic parameters of the Al2O3–MgO and Al2O3–CaO–MgO systems for improved accuracy.
  • Utilized the CALPHAD method for thermodynamic reassessment
  • Refined MgAl2O4 spinel phase parameters
  • Integrated reliable phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties data
  • Optimized parameters for liquid phase and ternary compounds
  • Achieved a consistent thermodynamic description of the Al2O3–MgO system
  • Resolved discrepancies in solid-phase equilibria from previous assessments
  • Improved alignment with experimental results on phase diagrams and liquidus projections

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to a few issues in previous assessments, a comprehensive thermodynamic reassessment of the Al 2 O 3 –MgO and Al 2 O 3 –CaO–MgO systems was performed using the CALPHAD method. In the present work, the modeling of the Al 2 O 3 –MgO system focused on refining the parameters of the MgAl 2 O 4 spinel phase to better match the degree of inversion data and enhance the reliability of the parameters at different temperature ranges. By integrating reliable phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties data for optimization, a consistent thermodynamic description of the Al 2 O 3 –MgO system was obtained. Subsequently, the Al 2 O 3 –CaO–MgO ternary system was reassessed by combining the thermodynamic descriptions of the CaO–MgO and Al 2 O 3 –CaO systems from the literature. The thermodynamic parameters for the liquid phase and the ternary compounds (3CaO·MgO·2Al 2 O 3 , CaO·∙2MgO·8Al 2 O 3 , and 2CaO·2MgO·14Al 2 O 3 ) were optimized to reproduce the phase diagrams, including various vertical sections and the liquidus projection. The present thermodynamic modeling has solved the discrepancies between previous thermodynamic assessments and subsequent experimental data regarding solid‐phase equilibria, thereby improving consistency with the experimental results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db36c24fe01fead37c4bc2https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.70719
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper