PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026Translational Psychiatry1 citationsOpen Access

Sustained effectiveness and safety of esketamine for major depressive disorder: a target trial simulation of real-world data

TLTing-Hui LiuHSHong-Shiang ShenJWJheng-Yan Wu

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of esketamine compared to conventional antidepressants in adults with major depressive disorder.
  • Target-trial simulation using data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network.
  • Inclusion of adults (≥ 18 years) with major depressive disorder receiving esketamine or conventional antidepressants.
  • Matched pairs analyzed up to 2 years after propensity-score matching for demographic and clinical variables.
  • Primary outcome focused on composite suicide-related events with hazard ratios estimated for various time periods.
  • Esketamine showed lower suicide-related events at days 1-14 (0.77% vs 3.78%; HR 0.19), and similar trends continued at days 15-365 and days 15-730.
  • Mortality rates were lower in the esketamine group (6.03% vs 7.63%; HR 0.61).
  • Recurrent major depressive disorder rates were also lower after 2 years (3.46% vs 4.67%; HR 0.76).
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events were lower during the initial 14 days (2.10% vs 4.97%; HR 0.39) but not significantly different afterward.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of esketamine in adults with Major depressive disorder (MDD), focusing on suicide-related events, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This target-trial simulation used the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. Adults (≥ 18 years) with MDD who received either esketamine or a conventional antidepressant during an inpatient episode were included. After propensity-score matching for demographic and clinical variables, matched pairs were analyzed followed up to 2 years. The primary outcome was a composite of suicide-related events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated across acute (days 1-14), intermediate (days 15-365), and long-term (days 15-730) periods. After 1:1 matching, 3383 pairs were analyzed. Esketamine use was associated with lower suicide-related events at days 1-14 (0.77% vs 3.78%; HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.12-0.29; P < 0.001), days 15-365 (2.13% vs 2.63%; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = 0.003), and days 15-730 (2.66% vs 2.78%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99; P = 0.04). Mortality was lower (6.03% vs 7.63%; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.51-0.73; P < 0.001), as was recurrent MDD at 2 years (3.46% vs 4.67%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = 0.04). MACEs were lower during days 1-14 (2.10% vs 4.97%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.51; P < 0.001) and not significantly different thereafter. In conclusion, esketamine treatment was associated with sustained reductions in suicidal ideation and all-cause mortality without increased MACEs risk. The composite suicide-related outcome was primarily driven by reductions in suicidal ideation; differences in suicide attempt and intentional self-harm could not be determined due to low event counts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc87ea3afacbeac03e9ec3https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-04032-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper