PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

All-on-Six Implant-Supported Full-Arch Maxillary Rehabilitation With Indirect Sinus Elevation and Multi-unit Abutment Conversion: A Case Report

SASumit AggarwalTJTarannum JindalSSSauharad Sachdeva

Key Points

  • To illustrate the successful rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla using the All-on-Six concept with indirect sinus elevation.
  • Clinical and Cone Beam Computed Tomography evaluation was performed.
  • Six implants were placed in specific regions of the maxilla.
  • An indirect sinus lift was conducted due to limited bone height.
  • Multi-unit abutments were used for prosthetic parallelism.
  • A digital workflow facilitated design and delivery of the prosthesis.
  • Achieved primary stability of implants between 30-50 Ncm.
  • The Implant Stability Quotient was 65, allowing for a delayed loading protocol.
  • Postoperative evaluations confirmed satisfactory implant positioning and adaptation of the prosthesis.
  • Functional and esthetic outcomes were successful after rehabilitation.

Abstract

Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla presents significant surgical and prosthetic challenges, particularly in achieving biomechanical stability and optimal esthetics. This case report describes prosthetically driven full-arch rehabilitation of a 33-year-old female patient using the All-on-Six concept in the maxillary arch. Following comprehensive clinical and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) evaluation, six implants were placed freehand in regions #13, #14, #16, #23, #24, and #26. An indirect sinus lift was performed in the #26 region due to limited residual bone height (8 mm). The primary stability during implant placement was between 30-50 Ncm, and the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) value was 65; therefore, a delayed loading protocol was adopted. After a five-month healing period, multi-unit abutments (0°, 17°, and 30°) were placed to achieve prosthetic parallelism. A splinted open-tray impression technique was used, and a digital workflow with Exocad software facilitated framework design. A screw-retained porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) prosthesis was delivered and torqued to 35 Ncm. Mandibular rehabilitation included crown lengthening and PFM crowns. Postoperative radiographic evaluation confirmed satisfactory implant positioning and prosthetic adaptation. This case demonstrated that meticulous surgical planning, prosthetic precision, and evidence-based protocols contribute to predictable functional and esthetic outcomes in full-arch maxillary rehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aggarwal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc87ea3afacbeac03ea09ahttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.106800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper