PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Frontiers in Aquaculture0 citationsOpen Access

Interactive effects of dietary fishmeal level and feeding frequency on growth performance, nutrient utilization, and waste outputs in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)

HVHector Victor Vedasto

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how different levels of dietary fishmeal and feeding frequencies influence growth and waste outputs in juvenile largemouth bass.
  • Conducted a 2 × 3 experimental design
  • Tested two levels of fishmeal (high and low)
  • Examined three feeding frequencies (once, twice, and three times daily)
  • Measured growth performance, nutrient balance, and waste outputs over 5 weeks
  • Growth improved with increased feeding frequency, especially at three meals per day
  • LFM diets showed lower growth but were somewhat compensated by higher feeding frequency
  • Higher feeding frequencies increased solid and dissolved nutrient waste outputs
  • Feeding twice daily achieved high growth with limited nutrient waste
  • Combination of 350 g kg −1 fishmeal and two meals per day yielded optimal results.

Abstract

Optimizing feeding strategies that balance growth performance with environmental sustainability is critical for intensive aquaculture. This study evaluated the interactive effects of dietary fishmeal and feeding frequency on the growth performance; body composition; balance of nitrogen, carbon, and phosphorus; and waste output in largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides . A 2 × 3 experimental design was used, with two fishmeal levels, 350 g kg −1 (high fishmeal, HFM) and 210 g kg −1 (low fishmeal, LFM), at three feeding frequencies—once a day (F1), twice a day (F2), and three times a day (F3)—forming six treatments: HFMF1, HFMF2, HFMF3, LFMF1, LFMF2, and LFMF3. The experiment lasted for 5 weeks due to typhoon. Growth performance improved significantly with increasing feeding frequency across both diets, with fish fed three times daily displaying the highest weight gain. The LFM diets resulted in moderately lower growth; however, increasing the feeding frequency compensated for much of this reduction. The retention efficiencies for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and carbon (C) declined at the highest feeding frequency, indicating a reduced metabolic efficiency. Waste output modeling showed that higher feeding frequencies increased both solid and dissolved nutrient losses, with LFM diets producing proportionally more dissolved nutrient waste relative to HFM diets. Although three meals per day maximized growth, it also intensified the nutrient discharge per unit of production. Feeding twice daily provided a balanced strategy, achieving high growth performance while limiting nutrient waste. The findings demonstrate that 350 g kg −1 fishmeal combined with two meals per day provides high growth performance, efficient nutrient utilization, and lower environmental waste load. Moreover, increasing the feeding frequency can mitigate reduced fishmeal inclusion, but at the cost of higher waste outputs. The study stresses the importance of the integration of feeding frequency with diet formulation to improve nutrient utilization and sustainability in largemouth bass aquaculture.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hector Victor Vedasto (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cd6f5cdc762e9d856e8dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/faquc.2026.1799404
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper