PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Emergency Medicine Journal0 citations

Diagnostic accuracy of the G-FAST score for detecting large vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

View Full Paper
JWJ WangHLHui-An LinHHHo-Chang Huang

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the G-FAST scale for identifying large vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients.
  • Conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
  • Performed comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus.
  • Estimated pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
  • Compared diagnostic performance across G-FAST and CPSS scales.
  • G-FAST ≥3 showed pooled sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 74.3%.
  • The area under the curve (AUC) for G-FAST was 0.80.
  • CPSS ≥2 had the highest sensitivity at 79.0%, while CPSS ≥3 had higher specificity but lower sensitivity.
  • G-FAST ≥3 demonstrated a balanced performance with a specificity greater than CPSS ≥2.
  • No statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance were found among the scales.

Abstract

Background Early and accurate detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) is essential for timely endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke. The Gaze-Face-Arm-Speech-Time (G-FAST) scale has been proposed as a potential prehospital screening tool for LVO than the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS). This study systematically evaluates the diagnostic performance of G-FAST and compares it with CPSS. Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase and Scopus was performed up to 31 December 2024. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated. Network meta-analysis was used to compare diagnostic performance across G-FAST≥3, CPSS≥2 and CPSS≥3. Results 13 studies involving 12 414 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis of G-FAST. G-FAST ≥3 demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 73.3% (95% CI 66.2% to 79.4%) and 74.3% (95% CI 65.3% to 81.6%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.80. In the network meta-analysis (six studies, 7012 participants), CPSS ≥2 showed the highest pooled sensitivity (79.0%, 95% CI 60.4% to 90.3%) and pooled specificity (66.1%, 95% CI 40.6% to 84.7%), whereas CPSS ≥3 demonstrated higher specificity (83.8%, 95% CI 63.6% to 93.9%) but reduced sensitivity (63.4%, 95% CI 40.1% to 81.7%). G-FAST ≥3 showed a more balanced performance between sensitivity (71.6%, 95% CI 51.4% to 85.7%) and specificity (76.4%, 95% CI 53.8% to 90.0%), with a numerically higher specificity than CPSS ≥2. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance among the scales. Conclusions G-FAST demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for prehospital LVO detection, with performance comparable to traditional scales. Its use provides a feasible alternative for pre-hospital stroke triage, though further large-scale validation is warranted. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023477601.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d858796https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215449
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2005 · 2,969 citations
  2. 2Capability of stroke scales to detect large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke : A pilot study2021 · 3 citations
  3. 3Effect of using G-FAST to recognize emergent large vessel occlusion: A city-wide community experience2023 · 7 citations
  4. 4Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Prehospital Stroke Scales Across the Range of Deficit Severity: Analysis of the Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Study2022 · 27 citations
  5. 5Prehospital stroke scales outperform National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in predicting large vessel occlusion in a large academic telestroke network2023 · 10 citations