PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine0 citations

“Clinical relevance of sacral ratio and sacral curvature in the radiological classification of anorectal malformations”

View Full Paper
AHAsmaa A. HasanAAAmina A. AhmedDZDorreia A. M. Zaghloul

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of sacral ratio and curvature as predictors of anorectal malformation types.
  • Conducted a prospective radiological observational study
  • Included 23 newborns with anorectal malformations
  • Classified anomalies using Wingspread classification
  • Measured sacral ratio in both anteroposterior and lateral views
  • Correlated sacral metrics with types of anorectal malformations
  • 47.8% were classified as high-type anorectal malformations
  • 39.1% classified as low-type and 13% as intermediate-type
  • Perineal fistula was the most common anomaly at 30.4%
  • Sacral ratio was significantly lower in the high-type group (p < 0.001)
  • Sacral curvature showed a lower mean in high-type but no significant difference (p = 0.115)

Abstract

Background Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are congenital anomalies that affect the developing hindgut. Sacral development can be used as a prognostic factor in these patients because it parallels the development of the muscles and nerves of the perineum. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of using sacral ratio (SR) and sacral curvature (SC) as predictors for the type of ARMs. Methods A prospective radiological observational study was conducted on 23 newborns with ARMs at Aswan University Hospitals. ARMs were classified according to the Wingspread classification into low, intermediate, and high. Sacral SR was measured in anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views and SC was measured in lateral view. Both were correlated with ARMs type. Results High-type ARMs represented 47.8%, low and intermediate were 39.1% and 13%, respectively. Perineal fistula was the most common anomaly (30.4%). SR in both AP and lateral views was significantly lower in the high ARMs group compared to other groups ( p < 0.001). SC showed a lower mean in high ARMs but without statistically significant difference ( p = 0.115). Conclusions SR in both AP and lateral views is a reliable marker for predicting ARMs severity. SC may provide complementary insights. Routine SR assessment is recommended in newborns with ARMs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320cc40886becb653fdcahttps://doi.org/10.1177/19345798261443965
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper