Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 21, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOpen Access

Assessing the robustness of the Action Agendas of the Rio Conventions

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HFHollie Folkard‐TappSCSander ChanSLSebastian Reyes de la Lanza

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Evaluates how robust Action Agendas influence climate and nature action, suggesting improvements for future efforts.

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze the robustness of various Action Agendas from major environmental conventions through a defined scorecard framework.
  • Assessment of Action Agendas using a scorecard based on the '5C' principles.
  • Application of 16 questions and 28 indicators to publicly available documentation.
  • Comparison of governance mechanisms across multiple conventions.
  • Variation in robustness: Marrakech Partnership displays strong catalytic qualities but low credibility.
  • CBD’s Action Agenda consistently underperforms due to lack of coherence.
  • Riyadh Action Agenda shows potential but its success depends on effective governance implementation.

Cite This Study

Folkard‐Tapp et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e7132bcb99343efc98cf3ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1698286
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share